Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25655369›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2015

The incidental pulmonary nodule in a child. Part 1: recommendations from the SPR Thoracic Imaging Committee regarding characterization, significance and follow-up.

Sjirk J Westra, Alan S Brody, Maryam Ghadimi Mahani, R Paul Guillerman, Shilpa V Hegde, Ramesh S Iyer, Edward Y Lee, Beverley Newman, Daniel J Podberesky, Paul G Thacker

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Primary lung adenocarcinoma in three adolescent patients affected by bone sarcomas.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Sjirk J WestraDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 34 Fruit St., White 246A, Boston, MA, 02114, USA, swestra@partners.org.
Alan S Brody
Maryam Ghadimi Mahani
R Paul Guillerman
Shilpa V Hegde
Ramesh S Iyer
Edward Y Lee
Beverley Newman
Daniel J Podberesky
Paul G Thacker
Arkansas Children's Hospital · USBoston Children's Hospital · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USMedical University of South Carolina · USMichigan Medicine · USNemours Children's Clinic · USSeattle Children's Hospital · USStanford University · USTexas Children's Hospital · US

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI MEINZEN-DERR, JAREEN, STRAWN, JEFFREY ROBERT · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No guidelines are in place for the follow-up and management of pulmonary nodules that are incidentally detected on CT in the pediatric population. The Fleischner guidelines, which were developed for the older adult population, do not apply to children. This review summarizes the evidence collected by the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) Thoracic Imaging Committee in its attempt to develop pediatric-specific guidelines.Small pulmonary opacities can be characterized as linear or as ground-glass or solid nodules. Linear opacities and ground-glass nodules are extremely unlikely to represent an early primary or metastatic malignancy in a child. In our review, we found a virtual absence of reported cases of a primary pulmonary malignancy presenting as an incidentally detected small lung nodule on CT in a healthy immune-competent child.Because of the lack of definitive information on the clinical significance of small lung nodules that are incidentally detected on CT in children, the management of those that do not have the typical characteristics of an intrapulmonary lymph node should be dictated by the clinical history as to possible exposure to infectious agents, the presence of an occult immunodeficiency, the much higher likelihood that the nodule represents a metastasis than a primary lung tumor, and ultimately the individual preference of the child's caregiver. Nodules appearing in children with a history of immune deficiency, malignancy or congenital pulmonary airway malformation should not be considered incidental, and their workup should be dictated by the natural history of these underlying conditions.

Indexed as

Incidental FindingsTomography, X-Ray ComputedChild, PreschoolFollow-Up StudiesHumansLungLung NeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicSolitary Pulmonary Nodule

Identifiers

PMID25655369
OpenAlexW3006468429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.