Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25655233›Full record

ArticleCancer cytopathology2015

Comprehensive mutation profiling by next-generation sequencing of effusion fluids from patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.

Ronak H Shah, Sasinya N Scott, A Rose Brannon, Douglas A Levine, Oscar Lin, Michael F Berger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cytopathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Practice guidelines forJournal of medical genetics · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Invited review-next-generation sequencing: a modern tool in cytopathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Applying Precision Medicine to Ovarian Cancer: Proof-of-Principle for a "Molecular Second Look".International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ronak H ShahDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Sasinya N ScottDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
A Rose BrannonDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Douglas A LevineDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Oscar LinDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Michael F BergerDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Translational Research in Oncology Training ProgramT32CA160001 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SAWYERS, CHARLES L. · 2011 to 2020
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS T32 CA160001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMutation analysis for personalized treatment has become increasingly important in the management of different types of cancer. The advent of new DNA extraction protocols and sequencing platforms with reduced DNA input requirements might allow the use of cytology specimens for high-throughput mutation analysis. In this study, the authors evaluated the use of effusion fluid for next-generation sequencing-based, multigene mutation profiling.

methodsFour specimens from each of 5 patients who had at least stage III, high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma were selected: effusion fluid; frozen tumor; formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tumor; and matched normal blood. Frozen tumors from each patient were previously characterized by The Cancer Genomic Atlas (TCGA). DNA was extracted from all specimens and was sequenced using a custom hybridization capture-based assay. Genomic alterations were compared among all specimens from each patient as well as with mutations reported in TCGA for the same tumors.

resultsIn total, 17 distinct somatic mutations were identified in the cohort. Ten of 17 mutations were reported in TCGA and were called in all 3 malignant specimens procured from the patients. Of the remaining 7 mutations, 2 were called in all 3 specimens, and the other 5 were sample-specific. Two mutations were detected only in the cytology specimens. Copy number profiles were concordant among the tumors analyzed.

conclusionsCytology specimens represent suitable material for high-throughput sequencing, because all mutations described by TCGA were independently identified in the effusion fluid. Differences in mutations detected in samples procured from the same patient may reflect tumor heterogeneity.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAgedAscitic FluidCase-Control StudiesCystadenocarcinoma, SerousDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA, NeoplasmFemaleFrozen SectionsGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm InvasivenessDNA, Neoplasmcarcinomacytologynext-generation sequencingovarian

Identifiers

PMID25655233
PMCPMC4992943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.