ArticleCirculation research2015
Direct evaluation of myocardial viability and stem cell engraftment demonstrates salvage of the injured myocardium.
Article in Circulation research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- MiR-21-5p-enriched exosomes from hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes exhibit superior cardiac repair efficacy compared to hiPSC-derived exosomes in a murine MI model.World journal of stem cells · 2025Article
- Review
- Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Based Products: Challenges and Clinical Therapeutic Options.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies of extracellular vesicles in cardiovascular diseases.MedComm · 2023Review
- Keratose Hydrogel Drives Differentiation of Cardiac Vascular Smooth Muscle Progenitor Cells: Implications in Ischemic Treatment.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2023Article
- Optical and MRI Multimodal Tracing of Stem Cells In Vivo.Molecular imaging · 2023Review
- Opportunities and challenges in stem cell therapy in cardiovascular diseases: Position standing in 2022.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022Review
- S100A8/A9 Enhances Immunomodulatory and Tissue-Repairing Properties of Human Amniotic Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- 3D bioprinting of stem cell-laden cardiac patch: A promising alternative for myocardial repair.APL bioengineering · 2021Review
- miR-106a-363 cluster in extracellular vesicles promotes endogenous myocardial repair via Notch3 pathway in ischemic heart injury.Basic research in cardiology · 2021Article
- Characteristics and Therapeutic Potential of Human Amnion-Derived Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Exosomes From Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes Promote Autophagy for Myocardial Repair.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
- Manganese-enhanced TScientific reports · 2020Article
- Utilization of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells for Cardiac Repair.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Review
- Nanoscale Technologies for Prevention and Treatment of Heart Failure: Challenges and Opportunities.Chemical reviews · 2019Review
- C1q/tumor necrosis factor-related protein-3-engineered mesenchymal stromal cells attenuate cardiac impairment in mice with myocardial infarction.Cell death & disease · 2019Article
- Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell (iPSC)-Derived Exosomes for Precision Medicine in Heart Failure.Circulation research · 2018Review
- Recent Progress in Stem Cell Modification for Cardiac Regeneration.Stem cells international · 2018Review
- Manganese-Enhanced TContrast media & molecular imaging · 2018Article
- Exosomes: Basic Biology and Technological Advancements Suggesting Their Potential as Ischemic Heart Disease Therapeutics.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleThe mechanism of functional restoration by stem cell therapy remains poorly understood. Novel manganese-enhanced MRI and bioluminescence reporter gene imaging were applied to follow myocardial viability and cell engraftment, respectively. Human-placenta-derived amniotic mesenchymal stem cells (AMCs) demonstrate unique immunoregulatory and precardiac properties. In this study, the restorative effects of 3 AMC-derived subpopulations were examined in a murine myocardial injury model: (1) unselected AMCs, (2) ckit(+)AMCs, and (3) AMC-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (MiPSCs).
objectiveTo determine the differential restorative effects of the AMC-derived subpopulations in the murine myocardial injury model using multimodality imaging. METHODS AND
resultsSCID (severe combined immunodeficiency) mice underwent left anterior descending artery ligation and were divided into 4 treatment arms: (1) normal saline control (n=14), (2) unselected AMCs (n=10), (3) ckit(+)AMCs (n=13), and (4) MiPSCs (n=11). Cardiac MRI assessed myocardial viability and left ventricular function, whereas bioluminescence imaging assessed stem cell engraftment during a 4-week period. Immunohistological labeling and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction of the explanted myocardium were performed. The unselected AMC and ckit(+)AMC-treated mice demonstrated transient left ventricular functional improvement. However, the MiPSCs exhibited a significantly greater increase in left ventricular function compared with all the other groups during the entire 4-week period. Left ventricular functional improvement correlated with increased myocardial viability and sustained stem cell engraftment. The MiPSC-treated animals lacked any evidence of de novo cardiac differentiation.
conclusionThe functional restoration seen in MiPSCs was characterized by increased myocardial viability and sustained engraftment without de novo cardiac differentiation, indicating salvage of the injured myocardium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.