Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25654978›Full record

ArticleGenome research2015

Bacterial genome reduction using the progressive clustering of deletions via yeast sexual cycling.

Yo Suzuki, Nacyra Assad-Garcia, Maxim Kostylev, Vladimir N Noskov, Kim S Wise, Bogumil J Karas, Jason Stam, Michael G Montague, Timothy J Hanly, Nico J Enriquez and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. iScience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Host-Pathogen Interactions ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Overcoming Challenges in Engineering the Genetic Code.Journal of molecular biology · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yo SuzukiSynthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA; ysuzuki@jcvi.org.
Nacyra Assad-GarciaSynthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA;
Maxim KostylevSynthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA;
Vladimir N NoskovSynthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA;
Kim S WiseSynthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA; Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65212, USA;
Bogumil J KarasSynthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA;
Jason StamSynthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA;
Michael G MontagueSynthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA;
Timothy J HanlySynthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA;
Nico J EnriquezSynthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA;
Adi RamonSynthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA;
Gregory M GoldgofSynthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA; University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.
R Alexander RichterSynthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA;
Sanjay VasheeSynthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA;
Ray-Yuan ChuangSynthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA;
Elizabeth A WinzelerUniversity of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.
Clyde A HutchisonSynthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA;
Daniel G GibsonSynthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA;
Hamilton O SmithSynthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA;
John I GlassSynthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA; Synthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA;
J Craig VenterSynthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA; Synthetic Biology Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA;
J. Craig Venter Institute · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007198 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHI, NEIL C, INSEL, PAUL A · 1985 to 2024
$29.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of genetically tractable organisms with simple genomes is critical for the rapid, systems-level understanding of basic biological processes. Mycoplasma bacteria, with the smallest known genomes among free-living cellular organisms, are ideal models for this purpose, but the natural versions of these cells have genome complexities still too great to offer a comprehensive view of a fundamental life form. Here we describe an efficient method for reducing genomes from these organisms by identifying individually deletable regions using transposon mutagenesis and progressively clustering deleted genomic segments using meiotic recombination between the bacterial genomes harbored in yeast. Mycoplasmal genomes subjected to this process and transplanted into recipient cells yielded two mycoplasma strains. The first simultaneously lacked eight singly deletable regions of the genome, representing a total of 91 genes and ∼ 10% of the original genome. The second strain lacked seven of the eight regions, representing 84 genes. Growth assay data revealed an absence of genetic interactions among the 91 genes under tested conditions. Despite predicted effects of the deletions on sugar metabolism and the proteome, growth rates were unaffected by the gene deletions in the seven-deletion strain. These results support the feasibility of using single-gene disruption data to design and construct viable genomes lacking multiple genes, paving the way toward genome minimization. The progressive clustering method is expected to be effective for the reorganization of any mega-sized DNA molecules cloned in yeast, facilitating the construction of designer genomes in microbes as well as genomic fragments for genetic engineering of higher eukaryotes.

Indexed as

Gene Transfer, HorizontalGenome, BacterialMultigene FamilySequence DeletionBacteriaDNA Transposable ElementsYeastsDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID25654978
PMCPMC4352883
OpenAlexW2150676832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.