Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25654774›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2015

Access disparity and health inequality of the elderly: unmet needs and delayed healthcare.

Tetsuji Yamada, Chia-Ching Chen, Chiyoe Murata, Hiroshi Hirai, Toshiyuki Ojima, Katsunori Kondo, Joseph R Harris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Birth Cohort Colorectal Cancer (CRC): Implications for Research and Practice.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tetsuji YamadaDepartment of Economics, Center for Children and Childhood Studies, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, 311 North 5th Street, Camden, NJ 08102, USA. tyamada@crab.rutgers.edu.
Chia-Ching ChenDepartment of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Health Sciences & Practice, New York Medical College, 95 Grasslands Rd., Valhalla, NY 10595, USA. ChiaChing_Chen@nymc.edu.
Chiyoe MurataDepartment of Social Science, Center for Gerontology and Social Science, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 35 Gengo, Morioka cho, Obu-shi, Aichi-ken, 474-8511 Japan. cmurata@ncgg.go.jp.
Hiroshi HiraiDepartment of Civil Environmental Engineering, Iwate University, 4-3-5, Ueda, Morioka-shi, Iwate-ken, 020-8551 Japan. hirai181kan@gmail.com.
Toshiyuki OjimaDepartment of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama Higashiku, Hamamatsu-shi, Shizuoka-ken, 431-3192 Japan. ojima@hama-med.ac.jp.
Katsunori KondoCenter for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuou-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba-ken, 260-8670 Japan. kkondo@chiba-u.jp.
Joseph R HarrisDepartment of Public Policy and Administration, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, 311 North 5th Street, Camden, NJ 08102, USA. hajoseph@scarletmail.rutgers.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate healthcare access disparity that will cause delayed and unmet healthcare needs for the elderly, and to examine health inequality and healthcare cost burden for the elderly. To produce clear policy applications, this study adapts a modified PRECEDE-PROCEED model for framing theoretical and experimental approaches. Data were collected from a large collection of the Community Tracking Study Household Survey 2003-2004 of the USA. Reliability and construct validity are examined for internal consistency and estimation of disparity and inequality are analyzed by using probit/ols regressions. The results show that predisposing factors (e.g., attitude, beliefs, and perception by socio-demographic differences) are negatively associated with delayed healthcare. A 10% increase in enabling factors (e.g., availability of health insurance coverage, and usual sources of healthcare providers) are significantly associated with a 1% increase in healthcare financing factors. In addition, information through a socio-economic network and support system has a 5% impact on an access disparity. Income, health status, and health inequality are exogenously determined. Designing and implementing easy healthcare accessibility (healthcare system) and healthcare financing methods, and developing a socio-economic support network (including public health information) are essential in reducing delayed healthcare and health inequality.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Care SurveysHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services for the AgedHumansMaleMedicaidMedicareNeeds AssessmentReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID25654774
PMCPMC4344691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.