Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25654748›Full record

ArticleeLife2015

Auditory selective attention is enhanced by a task-irrelevant temporally coherent visual stimulus in human listeners.

Ross K Maddox, Huriye Atilgan, Jennifer K Bizley, Adrian K C Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The rhythm of sensory input shapes audio-visual temporal processing.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Article
  5. Integration of audiovisual speech perception: From infancy to older adults.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. fNIRS dataset during complex scene analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dissociable Neural Correlates of Multisensory Coherence and Selective Attention.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  14. Sound Improves Neuronal Encoding of Visual Stimuli in Mouse Primary Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Audiovisual speech perception: Moving beyond McGurk.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ross K MaddoxInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
Huriye AtilganEar Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jennifer K BizleyEar Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Adrian K C LeeInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.

Funding

Cortical Dynamics of Auditory AttentionR01DC013260 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LEE, ADRIAN KC · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013260NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC013260Wellcome Trust 098418Wellcome Trust WT098418MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In noisy settings, listening is aided by correlated dynamic visual cues gleaned from a talker's face-an improvement often attributed to visually reinforced linguistic information. In this study, we aimed to test the effect of audio-visual temporal coherence alone on selective listening, free of linguistic confounds. We presented listeners with competing auditory streams whose amplitude varied independently and a visual stimulus with varying radius, while manipulating the cross-modal temporal relationships. Performance improved when the auditory target's timecourse matched that of the visual stimulus. The fact that the coherence was between task-irrelevant stimulus features suggests that the observed improvement stemmed from the integration of auditory and visual streams into cross-modal objects, enabling listeners to better attend the target. These findings suggest that in everyday conditions, where listeners can often see the source of a sound, temporal cues provided by vision can help listeners to select one sound source from a mixture.

Indexed as

Photic StimulationTask Performance and AnalysisAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAttentionAuditory PerceptionBehaviorFemaleHumansMaleModels, BiologicalPitch DiscriminationTime FactorsYoung Adultauditory scene analysisauditory-visual integrationhumanmultisensoryneuroscienceselective attentiontemporal coherence

Identifiers

PMID25654748
PMCPMC4337603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.