Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25654431›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2015

Hospital patterns of mechanical ventilation for patients with exacerbations of COPD.

Peter K Lindenauer, Mihaela S Stefan, Meng-Shiou Shieh, Penelope S Pekow, Michael B Rothberg, Nicholas S Hill

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Specialist emergency care and COPD outcomes.BMJ open respiratory research · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Peter K Lindenauer1 Center for Quality of Care Research and.
Mihaela S Stefan
Meng-Shiou Shieh
Penelope S Pekow
Michael B Rothberg
Nicholas S Hill
Tufts University · USCleveland Clinic · USPulmonary and Critical Care Associates · USSouthern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

Tufts Clinical and Translation Science Institute (UL1)UL1TR000073 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SELKER, HARRY P. · 2012 to 2013
$5.5M
Implementation and Outcomes of Noninvasive Ventilation in COPDR18HL108810 · NHLBI · BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. · PI LINDENAUER, PETER KYLE · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
Comparing Noninvasive and Invasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory FailureK01HL114631 · NHLBI · BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. · PI STEFAN, MIHAELA S · 2013 to 2016
$565k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000073NHLBI NIH HHS 1R18HL108810-01NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL114631NHLBI NIH HHS R18 HL108810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleRandomized trials have shown that noninvasive ventilation (NIV) can reduce the need for intubation and improve the survival of patients with severe exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, it is not known whether hospitals with greater use of NIV achieve lower rates of intubation and better patient outcomes.

objectivesTo describe patterns of mechanical ventilation use for patients with COPD across a large sample of hospitals, and to analyze the relationship between use of NIV and other outcomes.

methodsCross-sectional analysis of 77,576 patients hospitalized for COPD between June 2009 and June 2011 at 386 U.S. hospitals. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsUsing hierarchical modeling, we estimated hospital risk-standardized percentages of ventilator starts that were noninvasive (RS-NIV%). We examined the association between RS-NIV% and other outcomes, including risk-standardized rates of invasive ventilation and NIV failure, total ventilation, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and costs. At the hospital level, the median RS-NIV% was 75.1% (range: 9.2-94.1%). Smaller hospitals and those located in rural areas had higher RS-NIV%. When stratified into quartiles on the basis of the RS-NIV%, hospitals in the highest quartile had lower risk-standardized rates of invasive mechanical ventilation (Q4 vs. Q1: 4.0% vs. 13.3%, P<0.01) and modestly higher risk-standardized total rates of ventilation (Q4 vs. Q1: 23.9% vs. 22.0%, P=0.03). Hospitals with the highest RS-NIV% had lower risk-standardized mortality among ventilated patients who received ventilation (Q4 vs. Q1: 8.5% vs. 9.0%, P=0.01) and marginally lower mortality rates among all patients with COPD (Q4 vs. Q1: 2.2% vs. 2.3%, P=0.03) compared with hospitals with the lowest RS-NIV%. Higher RS-NIV% was associated with lower hospital costs (Q4 vs. Q1: $11,148 vs. $14,032, P<0.001), shorter length of stay (Q4 vs. Q1: 5.5 vs. 6.8 d, P<0.001), and lower NIV failure rates (Q4 vs. Q1: 12.8 vs. 32.5%, P<0.001).

conclusionsUse of NIV as the initial ventilation strategy for patients with COPD varies considerably across hospitals. Institutions with greater use of NIV have lower rates of invasive mechanical ventilation and better patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareRespiration, ArtificialAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospital MortalityHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentUnited StatesCOPDcosts and cost analysiscross-sectional analysislength of stayoutcomes research

Identifiers

PMID25654431
PMCPMC4418316
OpenAlexW2137686465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.