Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25654388›Full record

ArticleMedicine2015

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a negative risk factor for colorectal cancer prognosis.

Jie You, Sha Huang, Gui-Qian Huang, Gui-Qi Zhu, Rui-Min Ma, Wen-Yue Liu, Ke-Qing Shi, Gui-Long Guo, Yong-Ping Chen, Martin Braddock and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease - A multisystem disease?World journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jie YouFrom the Department of Oncological Surgery (JY, R-MM,G-LG); Department of Infection and Liver Diseases, Liver Research Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (SH, G-QH, G-QZ, W-YL, K-QS, Y-PC, M-HZ); School of the First Clinical Medical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University (SH, G-QZ); Renji School of Wenzhou Medical University (G-QH); Department of Endocrinology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (W-YL); Institute of Hepatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China (K-QS, Y-PC, M-HZ); Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca R&D, Loughborough, United Kingdom (MB).
Sha Huang
Gui-Qian Huang
Gui-Qi Zhu
Rui-Min Ma
Wen-Yue Liu
Ke-Qing Shi
Gui-Long Guo
Yong-Ping Chen
Martin Braddock
Ming-Hua Zheng
Wenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is known to be associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the relationship between NAFLD and the prognosis of CRC remains unclear. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates in patients with CRC and the secondary objective was to compare clinicopathologic variables which were stratified by NAFLD. We performed a large cohort study of 1314 patients who were first diagnosed with CRC between January 2006 and April 2011. Postoperative follow-up data were collected from out-patient medical records, telephone consultations, and social security death indices. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the cumulative survival rate. Clinicopathologic variables were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate analysis through a Cox proportional hazard regression model. The mean follow-up time was 52.7 ± 25.3 months. Upon baseline comparison, the NAFLD group had significantly higher values of body mass index, triglycerides, and uric acid and significantly lower values of high-density lipoprotein, compared with the non-NAFLD group (P < 0.05 for all). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to tumor location, TNM staging, tumor differentiation, carcinoembryonic antigen, and vascular invasion. The cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 96.1%, 85.2%, and 80.6%, respectively, in the NAFLD group, which were statistically significantly higher than the OS rates of 91.6%, 76.2%, and 67.8%, respectively, in the non-NAFLD group (P = 0.075, P = 0.002, P = 0.030, respectively). There was no difference in DFS rates between the CRC patients with and without NAFLD (P = 0.267). Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of NAFLD was an independent negative risk factor for OS after adjusting for clinicopathologic covariates (hazard ratio = 0.593; 95% confidence interval 0.442, 0.921; P = 0.020), but not for DFS (P = 0.270). NAFLD may play a protective role in OS for CRC patients. Further studies are needed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of putative protective effects in CRC patients with NAFLD.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBody Mass IndexColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLiver Function TestsMaleMiddle AgedNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseasePrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID25654388
PMCPMC4602729
OpenAlexW2011178612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.