ArticlePLoS computational biology2015
A quick guide for building a successful bioinformatics community.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Achieving inclusive healthcare through integrating education and research with AI and personalized curricula.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Fostering and sustaining collaborative innovation: Insights from ELIXIR Europe's life science Communities.F1000Research · 2025Article
- From the establishment of a national bioinformatics society to the development of a national bioinformatics infrastructure.F1000Research · 2024Article
- sRNAfrag: a pipeline and suite of tools to analyze fragmentation in small RNA sequencing data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Bioinformatics in Mexico: A diagnostic from the academic perspective and recommendations for a public policy.PloS one · 2020Article
- A quick guide for student-driven community genome annotation.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Building a local community of practice in scientific programming for life scientists.PLoS biology · 2018Article
- The ISCB Student Council Internship Program: Expanding computational biology capacity worldwide.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Matchmaking in Bioinformatics.F1000Research · 2018Article
- African partnerships through the H3Africa Consortium bring a genomic dimension to longitudinal population studies on the continent.International journal of epidemiology · 2016Article
- Tools and data services registry: a community effort to document bioinformatics resources.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- The GenABEL Project for statistical genomics.F1000Research · 2016Article
- Highlights of the 2 (nd) Bioinformatics Student Symposium by ISCB RSG-UK.F1000Research · 2016Article
- "Broadband" Bioinformatics Skills Transfer with the Knowledge Transfer Programme (KTP): Educational Model for Upliftment and Sustainable Development.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- Highlights of the 1st Student Symposium of the ISCB RSG UK.F1000Research · 2015Article
- Highlights of the first ISCB Student Council Symposium in Africa 2015.F1000Research · 2015Article
- Bioinformatics approach: A powerful tool for microRNA research.International journal of health sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
"Scientific community" refers to a group of people collaborating together on scientific-research-related activities who also share common goals, interests, and values. Such communities play a key role in many bioinformatics activities. Communities may be linked to a specific location or institute, or involve people working at many different institutions and locations. Education and training is typically an important component of these communities, providing a valuable context in which to develop skills and expertise, while also strengthening links and relationships within the community. Scientific communities facilitate: (i) the exchange and development of ideas and expertise; (ii) career development; (iii) coordinated funding activities; (iv) interactions and engagement with professionals from other fields; and (v) other activities beneficial to individual participants, communities, and the scientific field as a whole. It is thus beneficial at many different levels to understand the general features of successful, high-impact bioinformatics communities; how individual participants can contribute to the success of these communities; and the role of education and training within these communities. We present here a quick guide to building and maintaining a successful, high-impact bioinformatics community, along with an overview of the general benefits of participating in such communities. This article grew out of contributions made by organizers, presenters, panelists, and other participants of the ISMB/ECCB 2013 workshop "The 'How To Guide' for Establishing a Successful Bioinformatics Network" at the 21st Annual International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (ISMB) and the 12th European Conference on Computational Biology (ECCB).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.