ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2015
Systems and photosystems: cellular limits of autotrophic productivity in cyanobacteria.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 428 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of Multitrophic Biodiversity Patterns in the Irtysh River Basin Based on eDNA Metabarcoding.Biology · 2025Article
- Introduction of a phenylalanine sink in fast growing cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus PCC 11801 leads to improved PSII efficiency, linear electron transport, and carbon fixation.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- Biotechnological Applications of Cyanobacteria: Synechocystis and Synechococcus Strains.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2025Review
- Molecular complexity of the differential growth of freshwater diatoms along pH gradients.ISME communications · 2025Article
- Probing the design principles of photosynthetic systems through fluorescence noise measurement.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Vibrio Species and Cyanobacteria: Understanding Their Association in Local Shrimp Farm Using Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA).Microbial ecology · 2024Article
- Guide to Metabolomics Analysis: A Bioinformatics Workflow.Metabolites · 2022Review
- Generation of miniploid cells and improved natural transformation procedure for a model cyanobacteriumFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Exploitation of Hetero- and Phototrophic Metabolic Modules for Redox-Intensive Whole-Cell Biocatalysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Channeling Anabolic Side Products toward the Production of Nonessential Metabolites: Stable Malate Production inACS synthetic biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Tools for successful proliferation: diverse strategies of nutrient acquisition by a benthic cyanobacterium.The ISME journal · 2020Article
- Carbon Transfer from the Host Diatom Enables Fast Growth and High Rate of NPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Article
- A Mechanistic Model of Macromolecular Allocation, Elemental Stoichiometry, and Growth Rate in Phytoplankton.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Modelling microbial communities using biochemical resource allocation analysis.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019Article
- Active nitrogen fixation by Crocosphaera expands their niche despite the presence of ammonium - A case study.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Optimal proteome allocation strategies for phototrophic growth in a light-limited chemostat.Microbial cell factories · 2019Article
- Fiber-based platform for synchronous imaging of endogenous and exogenous fluorescence of biological tissue.Optics letters · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in the modeling of microbial growth and metabolism have shown that growth rate critically depends upon the optimal allocation of finite proteomic resources among different cellular functions and that modeling growth rates becomes more realistic with the explicit accounting for the costs of macromolecular synthesis, most importantly, protein expression. The "proteomic constraint" is considered together with its application to understanding photosynthetic microbial growth. The central hypothesis is that physical limits of cellular space (and corresponding solvation capacity) in conjunction with cell surface-to-volume ratios represent the underlying constraints on the maximal rate of autotrophic microbial growth. The limitation of cellular space thus constrains the size the total complement of macromolecules, dissolved ions, and metabolites. To a first approximation, the upper limit in the cellular amount of the total proteome is bounded this space limit. This predicts that adaptation to osmotic stress will result in lower maximal growth rates due to decreased cellular concentrations of core metabolic proteins necessary for cell growth owing the accumulation of compatible osmolytes, as surmised previously. The finite capacity of membrane and cytoplasmic space also leads to the hypothesis that the species-specific differences in maximal growth rates likely reflect differences in the allocation of space to niche-specific proteins with the corresponding diminution of space devoted to other functions including proteins of core autotrophic metabolism, which drive cell reproduction. An optimization model for autotrophic microbial growth, the autotrophic replicator model, was developed based upon previous work investigating heterotrophic growth. The present model describes autotrophic growth in terms of the allocation protein resources among core functional groups including the photosynthetic electron transport chain, light-harvesting antennae, and the ribosome groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.