ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2014
Bridging the gap: a roadmap to breaking the biological design barrier.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Host-aware Identification of Intrinsic Gene Expression Biopart Parameters using Combinatorial Libraries.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Engineering Ag43 Signal Peptides with Bacterial Display and Selection.Methods and protocols · 2022Article
- Unlocking the Power of Exosomes for Crossing Biological Barriers in Drug Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- High-performance chemical- and light-inducible recombinases in mammalian cells and mice.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Comparison between Effects of Retroactivity and Resource Competition upon Change in Downstream Reporter Genes of Synthetic Genetic Circuits.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Reducing DNA context dependence in bacterial promoters.PloS one · 2017Article
- FlowCal: A User-Friendly, Open Source Software Tool for Automatically Converting Flow Cytometry Data from Arbitrary to Calibrated Units.ACS synthetic biology · 2016Article
- Article
- Reproducibility of Fluorescent Expression from Engineered Biological Constructs in E. coli.PloS one · 2016Article
- Cas9 gRNA engineering for genome editing, activation and repression.Nature methods · 2015Article
- Signal-to-Noise Ratio Measures Efficacy of Biological Computing Devices and Circuits.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents an analysis of an emerging bottleneck in organism engineering, and paths by which it may be overcome. Recent years have seen the development of a profusion of synthetic biology tools, largely falling into two categories: high-level "design" tools aimed at mapping from organism specifications to nucleic acid sequences implementing those specifications, and low-level "build and test" tools aimed at faster, cheaper, and more reliable fabrication of those sequences and assays of their behavior in engineered biological organisms. Between the two families, however, there is a major gap: we still largely lack the predictive models and component characterization data required to effectively determine which of the many possible candidate sequences considered in the design phase are the most likely to produce useful results when built and tested. As low-level tools continue to mature, the bottleneck in biological systems engineering is shifting to be dominated by design, making this gap a critical barrier to progress. Considering how to address this gap, we find that widespread adoption of readily available analytic and assay methods is likely to lead to rapid improvement in available predictive models and component characterization models, as evidenced by a number of recent results. Such an enabling development is, in turn, likely to allow high-level tools to break the design barrier and support rapid development of transformative biological applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.