ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2014
Identifying Candida and other yeast-like fungi: utility of an identification algorithm in resource limited setting.
Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Identification, Virulence Factors, and Antifungal Susceptibility Profiles ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Detection and Identification of Food-Borne Yeasts: An Overview of the Relevant Methods and Their Evolution.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Article
- Medically important Candida spp. identification: an era beyond traditional methods.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2022Article
- Characterization of a Halotolerant Fungus from a Marine Sponge.BioMed research international · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe increasing recovery rates of unusual yeasts with innate drug resistance make accurate identification crucial for successful therapy and infection control measures. The current study was undertaken to study the utility of CHROMagar Candida (CC) and evaluate an identification algorithm, using germ tube test (GT), CC and a commercial identification kit, API ID 32C. SETTINGS AND
designThe prospective study was carried out at a private laboratory in Mumbai, India. MATERIALS AND
methodsIdentification of 533 yeast and yeast like isolates was carried out using an identification algorithm, comprising of the GT, CC and API tests.
resultsCC was useful to detect mixed cultures. We were able to identify 393/533, i.e. 73.7 % of isolates using GT and CC Tests only. This was because C. albicans and C. tropicalis, which can be reliably identified using CC, constituted 75.2 % of the isolates. We were unable to identify 140 isolates, i.e. 26.3 %, using GT and CC tests only and performed additional testing using API ID 32C. CC was not found to be reliable in identifying C. krusei.
conclusionThe diverse identification profile obtained in our study substantiates the need for all diagnostic microbiology laboratories to be better prepared for identifying unusual yeasts. Though GT or CC testing cannot alone suffice for identification of all clinically encountered Candida and yeast-like fungi, use of GT, CC and automated identification systems in a step-wise algorithm can enable the same in a more cost effective manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.