Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25653814›Full record

ArticleJournal of lasers in medical sciences2014

Photodynamic therapy as novel treatment for halitosis in adolescents: a case series study.

Rubia Garcia Lopes, Maria Eugenia Simões Onofre de Santi, Bruno Edin Franco, Alessandro Melo Deana, Renato Araujo Prates, Cristiane Miranda França, Kristianne Porta Santos Fernandes, Raquel Agnelli Mesquita Ferrari, Sandra Kalil Bussadori

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of lasers in medical sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rubia Garcia LopesUniversity Nove de Julho, Brazil.
Maria Eugenia Simões Onofre de SantiUniversity Nove de Julho, Brazil.
Bruno Edin FrancoSpecialist in Orthodontics.
Alessandro Melo DeanaUniversity Nove de Julho, Brazil.
Renato Araujo PratesUniversity Nove de Julho, Brazil.
Cristiane Miranda FrançaUniversity Nove de Julho, Brazil.
Kristianne Porta Santos FernandesUniversity Nove de Julho, Brazil.
Raquel Agnelli Mesquita FerrariUniversity Nove de Julho, Brazil.
Sandra Kalil BussadoriUniversity Nove de Julho, Brazil.
Universidade Nove de Julho · BRAmerican Association of Orthodontists · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHalitosis is a common problem that affects a large portion of the population worldwide. The origin of this condition is oral in 90% of cases and systemic in 10% of cases. The foul odor is caused mainly by volatile sulfur compounds produced by Gram-negative bacteria. However, it has recently been found that anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria also produce hydrogen sulfide (H2S) in the presence of amino acids, such as cysteine. Light with and without the combination of chemical agents has been used to induce therapeutic and antimicrobial effects. In photodynamic therapy, the antimicrobial effect is confined to areas covered by the photosensitizing dye. The aim of the present case series study was to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of photodynamic therapy on halitosis in adolescents through the analysis of volatile sulfur compounds measured using a sulfide meter (Halimeter®).

methodsFive adolescents aged 14 to 16 years were evaluated using a sulfide meter before and one hour after photodynamic therapy, which involved the use of methylene blue 0.005% on the middle third and posterior thirds of the dorsum of the tongue and nine points of laser irradiation in the red band (660 nm) with an energy dose of 9 J, power output of 100 mW and 90-seconds exposure time.

resultsA 31.8% reduction in the concentration of volatile sulfur compounds was found in the comparison of the initial and final readings. The statistically significant reduction (p = 0.0091) led to an absence of halitosis following treatment (mean: 58.2 ppb).

conclusionPhotodynamic therapy seems to be effective on reduction the concentration of volatile sulfur compounds.Considering the positive effects of photodynamic therapy in this case series, further studies involving microbiological analyses should be conducted to allow comparisons of the results.

Indexed as

adolescentlaserphotodynamic therapy

Identifiers

PMID25653814
PMCPMC4281993
OpenAlexW2103472999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.