ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2014
A framework for plasticity implementation on the SpiNNaker neural architecture.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-Term Bienenstock-Cooper-Munro Learning in Optoelectrically-Driven Flexible Halide Perovskite Single Crystal Memristors.Small methods · 2025Article
- Accelerating spiking neural network simulations with PymoNNto and PymoNNtorch.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2024Article
- A Hebbian Approach to Non-Spatial Prelinguistic Reasoning.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Parallelization of Neural Processing on Neuromorphic Hardware.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Event-Based Update of Synapses in Voltage-Based Learning Rules.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2021Article
- Real-time cortical simulation on neuromorphic hardware.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020Article
- An On-chip Spiking Neural Network for Estimation of the Head Pose of the iCub Robot.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Memory-Efficient Synaptic Connectivity for Spike-Timing- Dependent Plasticity.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Review
- Neural and Synaptic Array Transceiver: A Brain-Inspired Computing Framework for Embedded Learning.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- Neuromodulated Synaptic Plasticity on the SpiNNaker Neuromorphic System.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- On Practical Issues for Stochastic STDP Hardware With 1-bit Synaptic Weights.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- sPyNNaker: A Software Package for Running PyNN Simulations on SpiNNaker.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- GPUs Outperform Current HPC and Neuromorphic Solutions in Terms of Speed and Energy When Simulating a Highly-Connected Cortical Model.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- Event-Driven Random Back-Propagation: Enabling Neuromorphic Deep Learning Machines.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2017Article
- Deep Artificial Neural Networks and Neuromorphic Chips for Big Data Analysis: Pharmaceutical and Bioinformatics Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016Review
- Synapse-Centric Mapping of Cortical Models to the SpiNNaker Neuromorphic Architecture.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2016Article
- Modeling the Cerebellar Microcircuit: New Strategies for a Long-Standing Issue.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2016Review
- Large-Scale Simulations of Plastic Neural Networks on Neuromorphic Hardware.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2016Article
- Robustness of spiking Deep Belief Networks to noise and reduced bit precision of neuro-inspired hardware platforms.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many of the precise biological mechanisms of synaptic plasticity remain elusive, but simulations of neural networks have greatly enhanced our understanding of how specific global functions arise from the massively parallel computation of neurons and local Hebbian or spike-timing dependent plasticity rules. For simulating large portions of neural tissue, this has created an increasingly strong need for large scale simulations of plastic neural networks on special purpose hardware platforms, because synaptic transmissions and updates are badly matched to computing style supported by current architectures. Because of the great diversity of biological plasticity phenomena and the corresponding diversity of models, there is a great need for testing various hypotheses about plasticity before committing to one hardware implementation. Here we present a novel framework for investigating different plasticity approaches on the SpiNNaker distributed digital neural simulation platform. The key innovation of the proposed architecture is to exploit the reconfigurability of the ARM processors inside SpiNNaker, dedicating a subset of them exclusively to process synaptic plasticity updates, while the rest perform the usual neural and synaptic simulations. We demonstrate the flexibility of the proposed approach by showing the implementation of a variety of spike- and rate-based learning rules, including standard Spike-Timing dependent plasticity (STDP), voltage-dependent STDP, and the rate-based BCM rule. We analyze their performance and validate them by running classical learning experiments in real time on a 4-chip SpiNNaker board. The result is an efficient, modular, flexible and scalable framework, which provides a valuable tool for the fast and easy exploration of learning models of very different kinds on the parallel and reconfigurable SpiNNaker system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.