Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25653404›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2015

Monitoring of cytomegalovirus viral loads by two molecular assays in whole-blood and plasma samples from hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

N Esther Babady, Cindy Cheng, Evelyn Cumberbatch, Jeffrey Stiles, Genovefa Papanicolaou, Yi-Wei Tang

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pitfalls in Valganciclovir Prophylaxis Dose Adjustment Based on Renal Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Impact of Preemptive Therapy for Cytomegalovirus on Hospitalizations and Cost after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2020
    Article
  11. Impact of Preemptive Therapy for Cytomegalovirus on Toxicities after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2020
    Article
  12. Cytomegalovirus Infection in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Managed by the Preemptive Approach: Estimating the Impact on Healthcare Resource Utilization and Outcomes.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Cytomegalovirus resistance in CD34Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2018
    Article
  15. Co-Infections by Double-Stranded DNA Viruses after Ex Vivo T Cell-Depleted, CD34Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2017
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Cytomegalovirus Infection after CD34(+)-Selected Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2016
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

N Esther BabadyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA babadyn@mskcc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4399-1249
Cindy ChengDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Evelyn CumberbatchDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Jeffrey StilesDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Genovefa PapanicolaouDepartment of Medicine, Infectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Yi-Wei TangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA Department of Medicine, Infectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4888-6771

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral loads in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are typically monitored using quantitative molecular assays. The Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan CMV test (Cobas CMV) has recently been cleared by the FDA for the monitoring of CMV viral loads in plasma samples from transplant patients. In this study, we compare and correlate the viral loads obtained by a laboratory-developed test (LC CMV) (using Roche analyte-specific reagents [ASR] on the LightCycler 2.0) on whole-blood specimens with those obtained on corresponding plasma and whole-blood specimens by the Cobas CMV assay. Testing was performed on 773 archived patient specimens. The strength of the agreement was good for the two assays performed on whole blood (κ=0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.7) and moderate when the tests were performed on different sample types (κ=0.54; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.62 for the LC CMV whole blood [WB] assay versus Cobas plasma [PL], and κ=0.57; 95% CI, 0.5 to 0.65 for the Cobas WB assay versus Cobas PL), although the difference was not statistically significant. Using a combination gold standard (i.e., a true positive was a specimen that was positive by two or more methods), the sensitivity and specificity of the assays were 78.8% and 99.3% for the LC CMV assay, 85.2% and 98.1% for the Cobas CMV WB assay, and 100% and 90.5% for Cobas CMV PL assay, respectively. A comparison of the CMV viral load trends in both plasma and whole blood from a few patients with multiple positive successive samples showed similar slopes, with differences in the slope ranging from 0.01 to 0.22. However, the absolute value for individual viral load differed markedly with whole-blood viral loads, being on average 0.5- to 1.22-log higher than those in plasma. The Cobas CMV assay provides a valid option for the monitoring of viral loads in transplant patients. Due to its increased sensitivity, the detection of CMV DNA in patients with low viral loads (i.e., those below limit of quantification [LOQ]) is increased with the Cobas CMV assay in plasma specimens. Longitudinal prospective studies will be needed to examine the clinical significance of these low-level viral loads.

Indexed as

BloodCytomegalovirus InfectionsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansImmunocompromised HostMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesSensitivity and SpecificityViral Load

Identifiers

PMID25653404
PMCPMC4365257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.