Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25652920›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Statistical context shapes stimulus-specific adaptation in human auditory cortex.

Björn Herrmann, Molly J Henry, Elisa Kim Fromboluti, J Devin McAuley, Jonas Obleser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A two-system theory of sensory-evoked brain responses.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Enhanced deviant responses in patterned relative to random sound sequences.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2018
    Article
  15. Detecting change in stochastic sound sequences.PLoS computational biology · 2018
    Article
  16. Aging Affects Adaptation to Sound-Level Statistics in Human Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  17. [Effects of auditory response patterns on stimulus-specific adaptation of inferior colliculus neurons in awake mice].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2018
    Article
  18. Familiar But Unexpected: Effects of Sound Context Statistics on Auditory Responses in the Songbird Forebrain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Björn HerrmannMax Planck Research Group "Auditory Cognition," Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; and bjoern.herrmann@outlook.com.
Molly J HenryMax Planck Research Group "Auditory Cognition," Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; and.
Elisa Kim FrombolutiDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
J Devin McAuleyDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Jonas ObleserMax Planck Research Group "Auditory Cognition," Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7619-0459

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stimulus-specific adaptation is the phenomenon whereby neural response magnitude decreases with repeated stimulation. Inconsistencies between recent nonhuman animal recordings and computational modeling suggest dynamic influences on stimulus-specific adaptation. The present human electroencephalography (EEG) study investigates the potential role of statistical context in dynamically modulating stimulus-specific adaptation by examining the auditory cortex-generated N1 and P2 components. As in previous studies of stimulus-specific adaptation, listeners were presented with oddball sequences in which the presentation of a repeated tone was infrequently interrupted by rare spectral changes taking on three different magnitudes. Critically, the statistical context varied with respect to the probability of small versus large spectral changes within oddball sequences (half of the time a small change was most probable; in the other half a large change was most probable). We observed larger N1 and P2 amplitudes (i.e., release from adaptation) for all spectral changes in the small-change compared with the large-change statistical context. The increase in response magnitude also held for responses to tones presented with high probability, indicating that statistical adaptation can overrule stimulus probability per se in its influence on neural responses. Computational modeling showed that the degree of coadaptation in auditory cortex changed depending on the statistical context, which in turn affected stimulus-specific adaptation. Thus the present data demonstrate that stimulus-specific adaptation in human auditory cortex critically depends on statistical context. Finally, the present results challenge the implicit assumption of stationarity of neural response magnitudes that governs the practice of isolating established deviant-detection responses such as the mismatch negativity.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAcoustic StimulationAdultAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionData Interpretation, StatisticalElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansMaleModels, NeurologicalProbabilityYoung Adultauditory processingevent-related potentialsstimulus-specific adaptationstimulus statistics

Identifiers

PMID25652920
PMCPMC4416562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.