Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25652888›Full record

SynthesisIntensive care medicine2015

Assessment of impairment and activity limitations in the critically ill: a systematic review of measurement instruments and their clinimetric properties.

Selina M Parry, Catherine L Granger, Sue Berney, Jennifer Jones, Lisa Beach, Doa El-Ansary, René Koopman, Linda Denehy

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Intensive care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 75 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02899208 completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Can an Actigraph be Used to Predict Physical Function in Intensive Care Patients?

TypeobservationalSponsorZealand University HospitalRan2016 to 2017Enrolled40ConditionsCritical Illness, Quality of Life, Physical Activity
NCT02911896 completednot on this map

Physical Function in Critical Care (PaciFIC): An Multi-centre Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of MelbourneRan2015 to 2017Enrolled151ConditionsIntensive Care (ICU) Myopathy
NCT04762056 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Validation of Chelsea Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx) in COVID-19 Patients for Assessing Functional Status After Intensive Care Unit Discharge

TypeobservationalSponsorGaziosmanpasa Research and Education HospitalRan2021 to 2021Enrolled16ConditionsPost Intensive Care Unit Syndrome, Covid19ArmsChelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 185 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. ICU-acquired weakness.Intensive care medicine · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Return to work of major trauma survivors from a private level 1 trauma centre in South Africa.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Observational
  16. Be-SNAP: the Belgian Sepsis National Action Plan.Frontiers in public health · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Early Mobilization and Rehabilitation of Critically-Ill Patients.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Physical function measures in ICU survivors, where to now? A scoping review.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2024
    Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Selina M ParryDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Level 7 Alan Gilbert Building, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia, selina.parry@unimelb.edu.au.
Catherine L Granger
Sue Berney
Jennifer Jones
Lisa Beach
Doa El-Ansary
René Koopman
Linda Denehy
University of Melbourne · AUAustin Health · AUInstitute for Breathing and Sleep · AUMelbourne Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify measures used to evaluate the broad constructs of functional impairment and limitations in the critically ill across the continuum of recovery, and to evaluate, synthesise and compare the clinimetric properties of the measures identified.

methodsA systematic review of articles was carried out using the databases Medline (1950-2014), CINAHL (1982-2014), EMBASE (1980-2014), Cochrane Library (2014) and Scopus (1960-2014). Additional studies were identified by searching personal files. Eligibility criteria for selection: Search 1: studies which assessed muscle mass, strength or function using objective non-laboratory measures; Search 2: studies which evaluated a clinimetric property (reliability, measurement error, validity or responsiveness) for one of the measures identified in search one. Two independent reviewers assessed articles for inclusion and assessed risk of bias using the consensus-based standards for selection of health status measurement instruments checklist.

resultsThirty-three measures were identified; however, only 20 had established clinimetric properties. Ultrasonography, dynamometry, physical function in intensive care test scored and the Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool performed the strongest for the measurement of impairment of body systems (muscle mass and strength) and activity limitations (physical function), respectively.

conclusionsThere is considerable variability in the type of measures utilized to measure physical impairments and limitations in survivors of critical illness. Future work should identify a core set of standardized measures, which can be utilized across the continuum of critical illness recovery embedded within the International Classification of Functioning framework. This will enable improved comparisons between future studies, which in turn will assist in identifying the most effective treatment strategies to ameliorate the devastating longer-term outcomes of a critical illness.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingCritical IllnessHealth StatusMuscle StrengthPhysical ExertionFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID25652888
OpenAlexW1987245061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.