Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25652805›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Ear for recovery: protocol for a prospective study on parent-child communication and psychological recovery after paediatric injury.

Eva Alisic, Anna Barrett, Peter Bowles, Franz E Babl, Rowena Conroy, Roderick J McClure, Vicki Anderson, Matthias R Mehl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eva AlisicMonash Injury Research Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Emergency Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute Melbourne, Australia.
Anna BarrettMonash Injury Research Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Emergency Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute Melbourne, Australia.
Peter BowlesMonash Injury Research Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Emergency Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute Melbourne, Australia.
Franz E BablEmergency Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute Melbourne, Australia Emergency Department, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Rowena ConroyMonash Injury Research Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Emergency Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute Melbourne, Australia Psychology Service, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Roderick J McClureHarvard Injury Control Research Center, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
Vicki AndersonMonash Injury Research Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Emergency Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute Melbourne, Australia Psychology Service, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Matthias R MehlDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOne in six children who have been admitted to hospital with an injury develop persistent stress symptoms that put their development at risk. Parents play a crucial role in children's psychological recovery, however, it is unknown how specific parenting behaviours can help or hinder. We aim to describe the nature and quantity of parent-child communication after a child has been injured, and to examine how these interactions are related to children's psychological recovery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We are conducting a prospective observational study among children aged 3-16 years, who have been admitted to a tertiary children's hospital with a serious injury. Data collection involves a naturalistic observation of spontaneous, everyday parent-child communication at home, shortly after discharge, and an assessment of children's psychological recovery at 6 weeks and 3 months post-injury. Main analyses comprise descriptive statistics, cluster analysis and analyses of variance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne (33103) and Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (CF13/2515-2013001322). We aim to disseminate the findings through international peer-reviewed journals, international conferences and social media. Participants will be sent a summary of the overall study findings.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalCommunicationParent-Child RelationsParentingStress, PsychologicalAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleParentsPediatricsProspective StudiesResearch DesignStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticMENTAL HEALTHPAEDIATRICSSOCIAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID25652805
PMCPMC4322211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.