SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2015
Clinician-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rates: Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2019Pooled it
- Adjunct clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean rates: systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2018Pooled it
- Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- OptiBIRTH: a cluster randomised trial of a complex intervention to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Article
- The decision-making process in the choice of VBAC: Facilitators and barriers from women's perception, a systematic review.European journal of midwifery · 2025Review
- Analysis of Cesarean Section Ratios by Robson Classification.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2024Article
- How the Mode of Delivery Is Influenced by Patient's Opinions and Risk-Informed Consent in Women with a History of Caesarean Section? Is Vaginal Delivery a Real Option after Caesarean Section?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Application of a specific clinical pathway can affect the choice of trial of labor in patients with a history of cesarean delivery.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Observational
- Implementation of guidelines about women with previous cesarean section through educational/motivational interventions.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022Article
- Once a cesarean, always a cesarean? Obstetricians' approach to counseling for trial of labor after cesarean.AJOG global reports · 2022Article
- Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Section (VBAC) Model using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarch Process.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2021Article
- Labour after caesarean counselling documentation: a quality improvement intervention on labour and delivery.BMJ open quality · 2021Article
- Patient decision aid for trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) versus planned repeat cesarean delivery: a quasi-experimental pre-post study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Article
- Professional ethics, VBAC and COVID-19 pandemic: A challenge to be resolved (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe number of caesarean sections (CS) is increasing globally, and repeat CS after a previous CS is a significant contributor to the overall CS rate. Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) can be seen as a real and viable option for most women with previous CS. To achieve success, however, women need the support of their clinicians (obstetricians and midwives). The aim of this study was to evaluate clinician-centred interventions designed to increase the rate of VBAC.
methodsThe bibliographic databases of The Cochrane Library, PubMed, PsychINFO and CINAHL were searched for randomised controlled trials, including cluster randomised trials that evaluated the effectiveness of any intervention targeted directly at clinicians aimed at increasing VBAC rates. Included studies were appraised independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted independently by three reviewers. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the quality assessment tool, 'Effective Public Health Practice Project'. The primary outcome measure was VBAC rates.
results238 citations were screened, 255 were excluded by title and abstract. 11 full-text papers were reviewed; eight were excluded, resulting in three included papers. One study evaluated the effectiveness of antepartum x-ray pelvimetry (XRP) in 306 women with one previous CS. One study evaluated the effects of external peer review on CS birth in 45 hospitals, and the third evaluated opinion leader education and audit and feedback in 16 hospitals. The use of external peer review, audit and feedback had no significant effect on VBAC rates. An educational strategy delivered by an opinion leader significantly increased VBAC rates. The use of XRP significantly increased CS rates.
conclusionsThis systematic review indicates that few studies have evaluated the effects of clinician-centred interventions on VBAC rates, and interventions are of varying types which limited the ability to meta-analyse data. A further limitation is that the included studies were performed during the late 1980s-1990s. An opinion leader educational strategy confers benefit for increasing VBAC rates. This strategy should be further studied in different maternity care settings and with professionals other than physicians only.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.