Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25652235›Full record

ReviewDrug safety2015

Benefit-risk assessment of diacerein in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Elena Panova, Graeme Jones

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03404479 (A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Multi-center, Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Combination of Diacerein and Celecoxib Administered Orally in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03404479 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Multi-center, Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Combination of Diacerein and Celecoxib Administered Orally in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorWhan-Seok ChoiRan2018 to 2019Enrolled90ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsDiacerein, Celecoxib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Topical Diacerein Decreases Skin and Splenic CD11cInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Obtusifolin, an Anthraquinone Extracted fromPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena PanovaMenzies Research Institute, Private Bag 23, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Graeme Jones
Menzies School of Health Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the leading musculoskeletal cause of disability. Despite this, there is no consensus on the precise definition of OA and what is the best treatment to improve symptoms and slow disease progression. Current pharmacological treatments include analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors. None of those treatments are disease-modifying agents that target the core pathological processes in OA. Diacerein, a semi-synthetic anthraquinone derivative, inhibits the interleukin-1-beta (IL-1β) cytokine which, according to animal studies, plays a key role in the pathogenesis of OA. Diacerein was synthesized in 1980 and licensed in some European Union and Asian countries for up to 20 years. It has shown modest efficacy and acceptable tolerability in a number of trials of low to moderate quality. Early this year, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) conducted a review and restricted the use of diacerein-containing medicines. This was because of major concerns about the frequency and severity of diarrhoea and liver disorders in OA patients. In addition, the EMA's Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) questioned the limited clinical benefits of diacerein, which, in their view, did not outweigh its risks. The aim of this review is to provide a benefit-risk assessment of diacerein in the treatment of OA, based on asystematic evaluation of the published efficacy and safety data. Overall, there is evidence that diacerein is modestly effective for symptoms and possibly for radiographic changes, but this needs to be balanced against higher rates of gastrointestinal toxicity.

Indexed as

OsteoarthritisAnthraquinonesAnti-Inflammatory AgentsDiarrheaHumansRadiographyRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeAnthraquinonesAnti-Inflammatory Agentsdiacerein

Identifiers

PMID25652235
OpenAlexW2019752692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.