Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25652012›Full record

ArticleACS nano2015

Polymer nanoparticles mediated codelivery of antimiR-10b and antimiR-21 for achieving triple negative breast cancer therapy.

Rammohan Devulapally, Narayana M Sekar, Thillai V Sekar, Kira Foygel, Tarik F Massoud, Jürgen K Willmann, Ramasamy Paulmurugan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 251 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Engineered exosomes from different sources for cancer-targeted therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  20. Review

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rammohan DevulapallyMolecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Bio-X Program, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, 3155 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, California 94304, United States.
Narayana M SekarMolecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Bio-X Program, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, 3155 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, California 94304, United States.
Thillai V SekarMolecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Bio-X Program, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, 3155 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, California 94304, United States.
Kira FoygelMolecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Bio-X Program, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, 3155 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, California 94304, United States.
Tarik F MassoudMolecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Bio-X Program, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, 3155 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, California 94304, United States.
Jürgen K WillmannMolecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Bio-X Program, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, 3155 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, California 94304, United States.
Ramasamy PaulmuruganMolecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Bio-X Program, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, 3155 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, California 94304, United States.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Molecular Sensors for Imaging Histone Methylations in Living AnimalsR01CA161091 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PAULMURUGAN, RAMASAMY · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study shows the therapeutic outcome achieved in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) by simultaneously antagonizing miR-21-induced antiapoptosis and miR-10b-induced metastasis, using antisense-miR-21-PS and antisense-miR-10b-PS delivered by polymer nanoparticles (NPs). We synthesized the antisense-miR-21 and antisense-miR-10b loaded PLGA-b-PEG polymer NPs and evaluated their cellular uptake, serum stability, release profile, and the subsequent synchronous blocking of endogenous miR-21 and miR-10b function in TNBC cells in culture, and tumor xenografts in living animals using molecular imaging. Results show that multitarget antagonization of endogenous miRNAs could be an efficient strategy for targeting metastasis and antiapoptosis in the treatment of metastatic cancer. Targeted delivery of antisense-miR-21 and antisense-miR-10b coloaded urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) targeted polymer NPs treated mice showed substantial reduction in tumor growth at very low dose of 0.15 mg/kg, compared to the control NPs treated mice and 40% reduction in tumor growth compared to scramble peptide conjugated NPs treated mice, thus demonstrating a potential new therapeutic option for TNBC.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological TransportCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCell Transformation, NeoplasticDrug CarriersFemaleGenetic TherapyHumansMiceMicroRNAsNanomedicineNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm MetastasisPolyethylene GlycolsDrug CarriersMicroRNAsMIRN10 microRNA, humanMIRN21 microRNA, humanPolyethylene GlycolsPolyglactin 910poly(lactic-glycolic acid)-poly(ethyleneglycol) copolymerReceptors, Urokinase Plasminogen Activatoranti-miRsantisense-miRNAsbioluminescencecancer therapyin vivo molecular imagingmicroRNAnanoparticlesPLGAtargeted delivery

Identifiers

PMID25652012
PMCPMC4374409
OpenAlexW2050732886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.