Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25651994›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology in health and disease2015

Food-producing animals and their health in relation to human health.

Guillermo Téllez, Andrea Lauková, Juan D Latorre, Xochitl Hernandez-Velasco, Billy M Hargis, Todd Callaway

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology in health and disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects of the ProbioticLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Influence of Immune Parameters afterLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Assessment of Fermented Soybean Meal onAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guillermo TéllezDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA; gtellez@uark.edu.
Andrea LaukováInstitute of Animal Physiology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice, Slovakia.
Juan D LatorreDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Xochitl Hernandez-VelascoFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City, México.
Billy M HargisDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Todd CallawayUSDA-ARS, SPARC, College Station, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fields of immunology, microbiology, and nutrition converge in an astonishing way. Dietary ingredients have a profound effect on the composition of the gut microflora, which in turn regulates the physiology of metazoans. As such, nutritional components of the diet are of critical importance not only for meeting the nutrient requirements of the host, but also for the microbiome. During their coevolution, bacterial microbiota has established multiple mechanisms to influence the eukaryotic host, generally in a beneficial fashion. The microbiome encrypts a variety of metabolic functions that complements the physiology of their hosts. Over a century ago Eli Metchnikoff proposed the revolutionary idea to consume viable bacteria to promote health by modulating the intestinal microflora. The idea is more applicable now than ever, since bacterial antimicrobial resistance has become a serious worldwide problem both in medical and agricultural fields. The impending ban of antibiotics in animal feed due to the current concern over the spread of antibiotic resistance genes makes a compelling case for the development of alternative prophylactics. Nutritional approaches to counteract the debilitating effects of stress and infection may provide producers with useful alternatives to antibiotics. Improving the disease resistance of animals grown without antibiotics will benefit the animals' health, welfare, and production efficiency, and is also a key strategy in the effort to improve the microbiological safe status of animal-derived food products (e.g. by poultry, rabbits, ruminants, or pigs). This review presents some of the alternatives currently used in food-producing animals to influence their health in relation to human health.

Indexed as

healthintestinal microfloraprobioticsproduction efficiency

Identifiers

PMID25651994
PMCPMC4315780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.