Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25651937›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology2015

Mechanisms of airway hyper-responsiveness in asthma: the past, present and yet to come.

D G Chapman, C G Irvin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comment on: Bronchodilator response is linked with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe childhood asthma and elevated IL-4 and IL-13.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The testosterone paradox in asthma.Frontiers in allergy · 2026
    Review
  11. The importance of mechanical forces in chronic respiratory diseases.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Is There a Place for Cannabinoids in Asthma Treatment?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  20. MrgprC11American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D G ChapmanWoolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA.
C G Irvin

Funding

Translational Research in Lung Biology and DiseaseP30GM103532 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI IRVIN, CHARLES G · 2012 to 2016
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) has long been considered a cardinal feature of asthma. The development of the measurement of AHR 40 years ago initiated many important contributions to our understanding of asthma and other airway diseases. However, our understanding of AHR in asthma remains complicated by the multitude of potential underlying mechanisms which in reality are likely to have different contributions amongst individual patients. Therefore, the present review will discuss the current state of understanding of the major mechanisms proposed to contribute to AHR and highlight the way in which AHR testing is beginning to highlight distinct abnormalities associated with clinically relevant patient populations. In doing so we aim to provide a foundation by which future research can begin to ascribe certain mechanisms to specific patterns of bronchoconstriction and subsequently match phenotypes of bronchoconstriction with clinical phenotypes. We believe that this approach is not only within our grasp but will lead to improved mechanistic understanding of asthma phenotypes and we hoped to better inform the development of phenotype-targeted therapy.

Indexed as

AsthmaHumansPhenotypeRespiratory Function TestsRespiratory Hypersensitivity

Identifiers

PMID25651937
PMCPMC4386586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.