ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne1989
DNA sampling and informed consent.
Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- From tissues to genomes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2013Article
- Genomics and policymaking: from static models to complex systems?Human genetics · 2009Review
- The environmental genome project: ethical, legal, and social implications.Environmental health perspectives · 2000Article
- Bioethics for clinicians: 14. Ethics and genetics in medicine.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 1998Review
- A survey of DNA diagnostic laboratories regarding DNA banking.American journal of human genetics · 1995Article
- Code of ethics: day-to-day applications.Journal of genetic counseling · 1994Article
- Ethics of a genetic program for myotonic dystrophy.American journal of human genetics · 1991Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standard consent forms for blood and tissue sampling are inadequate for DNA sampling. However, creating new and separate forms for each type of activity associated with DNA analysis (banking, linkage analysis and genetic diagnosis) tends to dissociate the participant from what is essentially a medical continuum. Furthermore, DNA sampling involves the sharing of samples and data among centres. To ensure patient control throughout this multifaceted process, we have developed an integrated approach to obtaining consent for DNA sampling at each level of participation. Movement from one level to another is reflected in the choices offered to participants. This inclusive approach is based on the underlying principle of informed consent, namely the respect for individuality, confidentiality and freedom of choice. This approach should help practitioners of medical genetics recognize the medical context of DNA sampling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
2565159PMC1268974What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.