ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2015
Regulatory activities to address the needs of older patients.
Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of Clinical Trial Participation Among Older U.S. Adults With Multimorbidity: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Attitudes on participation in clinical drug trials: A nationally representative survey of older adults with multimorbidity.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024Article
- Prevalence and proportion by age and sex of chronic health conditions in a large healthcare system.PloS one · 2024Article
- Identification of a Link between Suspected Metabolic Syndrome and Cognitive Impairment within Pharmaceutical Care in Adults over 75 Years of Age.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Age-Related Medicine.Pharmaceutics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At the Drug Information Association (DIA) 49th annual meeting, for the first time regulators (Dr Francesca Cerreta, Dr Robert Temple and Dr Yasuko Asahina) from the three International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) co-sponsor regions came together in a forum to discuss their perspective on how the aging population impacts on drug development and on the design of clinical trials. In 2010, the ICH E7 Guideline (Studies in support of Special Populations: Geriatrics) was revised with the addition of a Questions and Answers document to take into account the rapidly changing world demographics. Regulators from the three ICH regions (Europe, USA and Japan) discuss here how they foresee the application of this guideline, and the impact that this might have on new drug development and clinical trial design. This article aims to summarize the discussions at the session for the benefit of a wider audience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.