Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25651298›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Treatment of irradiated mice with high-dose ascorbic acid reduced lethality.

Tomohito Sato, Manabu Kinoshita, Tetsuo Yamamoto, Masataka Ito, Takafumi Nishida, Masaru Takeuchi, Daizoh Saitoh, Shuhji Seki, Yasuo Mukai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Radiomitigators: Breakthroughs in Post-Radiation Recovery.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular Hydrogen in the Treatment of Respiratory Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Biological Protection in Deep Space Missions.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tomohito SatoMilitary Medicine Research Unit, Test and Evaluation Command, Ground Self-Defense Force, Setagaya, Tokyo, Japan.
Manabu KinoshitaDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Tetsuo YamamotoMilitary Medicine Research Unit, Test and Evaluation Command, Ground Self-Defense Force, Setagaya, Tokyo, Japan.
Masataka ItoDepartment of Developmental Anatomy and Regenerative Biology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Takafumi NishidaMilitary Medicine Research Unit, Test and Evaluation Command, Ground Self-Defense Force, Setagaya, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaru TakeuchiDepartment of Ophthalmology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Daizoh SaitohDivision of Traumatology, Research Institute, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Shuhji SekiDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Yasuo MukaiMilitary Medicine Research Unit, Test and Evaluation Command, Ground Self-Defense Force, Setagaya, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ascorbic acid is an effective antioxidant and free radical scavenger. Therefore, it is expected that ascorbic acid should act as a radioprotectant. We investigated the effects of post-radiation treatment with ascorbic acid on mouse survival. Mice received whole body irradiation (WBI) followed by intraperitoneal administration of ascorbic acid. Administration of 3 g/kg of ascorbic acid immediately after exposure significantly increased mouse survival after WBI at 7 to 8 Gy. However, administration of less than 3 g/kg of ascorbic acid was ineffective, and 4 or more g/kg was harmful to the mice. Post-exposure treatment with 3 g/kg of ascorbic acid reduced radiation-induced apoptosis in bone marrow cells and restored hematopoietic function. Treatment with ascorbic acid (3 g/kg) up to 24 h (1, 6, 12, or 24 h) after WBI at 7.5 Gy effectively improved mouse survival; however, treatments beyond 36 h were ineffective. Two treatments with ascorbic acid (1.5 g/kg × 2, immediately and 24 h after radiation, 3 g/kg in total) also improved mouse survival after WBI at 7.5 Gy, accompanied with suppression of radiation-induced free radical metabolites. In conclusion, administration of high-dose ascorbic acid might reduce radiation lethality in mice even after exposure.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntioxidantsApoptosisAscorbic AcidBone Marrow CellsHematopoiesisMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRadiation, IonizingRadiation-Protective AgentsSurvival AnalysisWhole-Body IrradiationAntioxidantsAscorbic AcidRadiation-Protective Agents

Identifiers

PMID25651298
PMCPMC4317183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.