Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25651246›Full record

Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2015

Efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus in refractory angina.

Stefan Verheye, E Marc Jolicœur, Miles W Behan, Thomas Pettersson, Paul Sainsbury, Jonathan Hill, Mathias Vrolix, Pierfrancesco Agostoni, Thomas Engstrom, Marino Labinaz and 11 more

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 112 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
24.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01205893 phase2completednot on this map

Study to Confirm the Safety and Efficacy of the Reducer on Patients With Refractory Angina

TypeinterventionalSponsorShockwave Medical, Inc.Ran2010 to 2013Enrolled104ConditionsRefractory AnginaArmsNeovasc Reducer, Control
NCT02710435 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

REDUCER-I: An Observational Study of the Neovasc Reducer™ System

TypeobservationalSponsorShockwave Medical, Inc.Ran2016 to 2028Enrolled400ConditionsAngina Pectoris, Angina Pectoris, Stable, Chronic Stable AnginaArmsReducer System
NCT04121845 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Influence of Coronary Sinus Reducer Implantation on Exertional Capacity, Extent of Myocardial Ischemia and hrECG Markers of Arrhythmogenicity in Patients With Refractory Angina Pectoris

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Centre LjubljanaRan2019 to 2022Enrolled25ConditionsRefractory Angina PectorisArmsCoronary Sinus Reducer device, Sham procedure
NCT05102019 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of the COronary SInus Reducer in Patients With Refractory Angina II

TypeinterventionalSponsorShockwave Medical, Inc.Ran2022 to 2032Enrolled380ConditionsRefractory AnginaArmsArm 1: treatment with Shockwave Reducer, Arm 2 (control): Implantation procedure with no device implanted, Arm 3 (unblinded, non-randomized): Single arm registry
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 292 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Precision percutaneous coronary intervention.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2026
    Review
  17. Contemporary and Emerging Therapies in the Management of Refractory Angina: A Clinical Review.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 13 institutions in 7 countries.

Stefan VerheyeFrom Antwerp Cardiovascular Center, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Middelheim, Antwerp (S.V., N.M.), and Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Hospital, Genk (M.V.) - both in Belgium; Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal (E.M.J., S.D., J.-F.T.), Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa (M.L.), and Neovasc, Richmond, BC (M.S.) - all in Canada; Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (M.W.B., N.G.U.), Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford (P.S., S.L.), and Kings College Hospital (J.H.) and the National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, and National Institute for Health Research Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust (R.S.), London - all in the United Kingdom; Kristianstad Central Hospital, Kristianstad, Sweden (T.P.); University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (P.A.); Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (T.E.); Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (T.D.H.); John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans (C.J.W.); the Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, and the Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston - both in Massachusetts (E.R.E.); and Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University Medical School, Tel Aviv, Israel (S.B.).
E Marc Jolicœur
Miles W Behan
Thomas Pettersson
Paul Sainsbury
Jonathan Hill
Mathias Vrolix
Pierfrancesco Agostoni
Thomas Engstrom
Marino Labinaz
Ranil de Silva
Marc Schwartz
Nathalie Meyten
Neal G Uren
Serge Doucet
Jean-François Tanguay
Steven Lindsay
Timothy D Henry
Christopher J White
Elazer R Edelman
Shmuel Banai
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USMontreal Heart Institute · CABradford Royal Infirmary · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBZiekenhuisnetwerk Antwerpen Stuivenberg · BEBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USKing's College - North Carolina · USKristianstad University · SENational Institute for Health Research · GBOttawa Heart InstituteTel Aviv University · ILZiekenhuis Oost-Limburg · BE

Funding

Vascular Drug Delivery - Supplement for EquipmentR01GM049039 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI EDELMAN, ELAZER R · 1994 to 2019
$8.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM049039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany patients with coronary artery disease who are not candidates for revascularization have refractory angina despite standard medical therapy. The balloon-expandable, stainless steel, hourglass-shaped, coronary-sinus reducing device creates a focal narrowing and increases pressure in the coronary sinus, thus redistributing blood into ischemic myocardium.

methodsWe randomly assigned 104 patients with Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class III or IV angina (on a scale from I to IV, with higher classes indicating greater limitations on physical activity owing to angina) and myocardial ischemia, who were not candidates for revascularization, to implantation of the device (treatment group) or to a sham procedure (control group). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with an improvement of at least two CCS angina classes at 6 months.

resultsA total of 35% of the patients in the treatment group (18 of 52 patients), as compared with 15% of those in the control group (8 of 52), had an improvement of at least two CCS angina classes at 6 months (P=0.02). The device was also associated with improvement of at least one CCS angina class in 71% of the patients in the treatment group (37 of 52 patients), as compared with 42% of those in the control group (22 of 52) (P=0.003). Quality of life as assessed with the use of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire was significantly improved in the treatment group, as compared with the control group (improvement on a 100-point scale, 17.6 vs. 7.6 points; P=0.03). There were no significant between-group differences in improvement in exercise time or in the mean change in the wall-motion index as assessed by means of dobutamine echocardiography. At 6 months, 1 patient in the treatment group had had a myocardial infarction; in the control group, 1 patient had died and 3 had had a myocardial infarction.

conclusionsIn this small clinical trial, implantation of the coronary-sinus reducing device was associated with significant improvement in symptoms and quality of life in patients with refractory angina who were not candidates for revascularization. (Funded by Neovasc; COSIRA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01205893.).

Indexed as

Cardiac CathetersCoronary SinusAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngina PectorisCardiac CatheterizationCoronary AngiographyEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial RevascularizationPatient AcuityQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID25651246
PMCPMC6647842
OpenAlexW2166931823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.