Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25650964›Full record

Trial reportJAMA surgery2015

Five-year outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic duodenal switch in patients with body mass index of 50 to 60: a randomized clinical trial.

Hilde Risstad, Torgeir T Søvik, My Engström, Erlend T Aasheim, Morten W Fagerland, Monika Fagevik Olsén, Jon A Kristinsson, Carel W le Roux, Thomas Bøhmer, Kåre I Birkeland and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00327912 (Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs. Laparoscopic BPD-Duodenal Switch for Superobesity), which is not on this map. Cited by 88 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
25.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00327912 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs. Laparoscopic BPD-Duodenal Switch for Superobesity (BMI > 50 kg/m2)- A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGöteborg UniversityRan2006 to 2017Enrolled60ConditionsObesity, Diabetes, HypertensionArmsLaparoscopic Biliopancreatic diversion with Duodenal switch, Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 223 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Hilde RisstadDepartment of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity, and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway2Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Torgeir T SøvikDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
My EngströmDepartment of Gastrosurgical Research and Education, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Erlend T AasheimDepartment of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity, and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Morten W FagerlandUnit of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Monika Fagevik OlsénDepartment of Gastrosurgical Research and Education, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jon A KristinssonDepartment of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity, and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Carel W le RouxDepartment of Gastrosurgical Research and Education, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden6Diabetes Complications Research Centre, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dubl.
Thomas BøhmerNutritional Laboratory, Biochemical Department, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Kåre I BirkelandDepartment of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity, and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Tom MalaDepartment of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity, and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway3Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Torsten OlbersDepartment of Gastrosurgical Research and Education, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThere is no consensus as to which bariatric procedure is preferred to reduce weight and improve health in patients with a body mass index higher than 50.

objectiveTo compare 5-year outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (gastric bypass) and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (duodenal switch). DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsRandomized clinical open-label trial at Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. Participants were recruited between March 17, 2006, and August 20, 2007, and included 60 patients aged 20 to 50 years with a body mass index of 50 to 60. The current study provides the 5-year follow-up analyses by intent to treat, excluding one participant accepted for inclusion who declined being operated on prior to knowing to what group he was randomized.

interventionsLaparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic duodenal switch. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Body mass index and secondary outcomes including anthropometric measures, cardiometabolic risk factors, pulmonary function, vitamin status, gastrointestinal symptoms, health-related quality of life, and adverse events.

resultsSixty patients were randomly assigned and operated on with gastric bypass (n = 31) and duodenal switch (n = 29). Fifty-five patients (92%) completed the study. Five years after surgery, the mean reductions in body mass index were 13.6 (95% CI, 11.0-16.1) and 22.1 (95% CI, 19.5-24.7) after gastric bypass and duodenal switch, respectively. The mean between-group difference was 8.5 (95% CI, 4.9-12.2; P < .001). Remission rates of type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome and changes in blood pressure and lung function were similar between groups. Reductions in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and fasting glucose were significantly greater after duodenal switch compared with gastric bypass. Serum concentrations of vitamin A and 25-hydroxyvitamin D were significantly reduced after duodenal switch compared with gastric bypass. Duodenal switch was associated with more gastrointestinal adverse effects. Health-related quality of life was similar between groups. Patients with duodenal switch underwent more surgical procedures related to the initial procedure (13 [44.8%] vs 3 [9.7%] patients; P = .002) and had significantly more hospital admissions compared with patients with gastric bypass. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In patients with a body mass index of 50 to 60, duodenal switch resulted in greater weight loss and greater improvements in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, and glucose levels 5 years after surgery compared with gastric bypass while improvements in health-related quality of life were similar. However, duodenal switch was associated with more surgical, nutritional, and gastrointestinal adverse effects.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00327912.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyAdultAnthropometryBlood GlucoseBody Mass IndexDuodenumFemaleGastric BypassHumansLipidsMaleMiddle AgedNorwayObesity, MorbidQuality of LifeSwedenBlood GlucoseLipids

Identifiers

PMID25650964
OpenAlexW2060868901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.