Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25650939›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2015

Critical examination of the colloidal particle model of globular proteins.

Prasad S Sarangapani, Steven D Hudson, Ronald L Jones, Jack F Douglas, Jai A Pathak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Modeling the depletion effect caused by an addition of polymer to monoclonal antibody solutions.Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Response to Comment to the Editor.Biophysical journal · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Prasad S SarangapaniFormulation Sciences Department, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Steven D HudsonMaterials Science and Engineering Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Ronald L JonesMaterials Science and Engineering Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Jack F DouglasMaterials Science and Engineering Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Jai A PathakFormulation Sciences Department, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, Maryland. Electronic address: pathakj@medimmune.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies of globular protein solutions have uniformly adopted a colloidal view of proteins as particles, a perspective that neglects the polymeric primary structure of these biological macromolecules, their intrinsic flexibility, and their ability to sample a large configurational space. While the colloidal perspective often serves as a useful idealization in many cases, the macromolecular identity of proteins must reveal itself under thermodynamic conditions in which the native state is no longer stable, such as denaturing solvents and high protein concentrations where macromolecules tend to have screened excluded volume, charge, and hydrodynamic interactions. Under extreme pH conditions, charge repulsion interactions within the protein chain can overcome the attractive hydrogen-bonding interactions, holding it in its native globular state. Conformational changes can therefore be expected to have great significance on the shear viscosity and other rheological properties of protein solutions. These changes are not envisioned in conventional colloidal protein models and we have initiated an investigation of the scattering and rheological properties of model proteins. We initiate this effort by considering bovine serum albumin because it is a globular protein whose solution properties have also been extensively investigated as a function of pH, temperature, ionic strength, and concentration. As we anticipated, near-ultraviolet circular dichroism measurements and intrinsic viscosity measurements clearly indicate that the bovine serum albumin tertiary structure changes as protein concentration and pH are varied. Our findings point to limited validity of the colloidal protein model and to the need for further consideration and quantification of the effects of conformational changes on protein solution viscosity, protein association, and the phase behavior. Small-angle Neutron Scattering measurements have allowed us to assess how these conformational changes influence protein size, shape, and interprotein interaction strength.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularAnimalsCattleCircular DichroismColloidsDiffusionHydrodynamicsHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationSerum Albumin, BovineStatic ElectricityViscosityColloidsSerum Albumin, Bovine

Identifiers

PMID25650939
PMCPMC4317558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.