Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25650771›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2015

Electroporation of functional bacterial effectors into mammalian cells.

Ryan L Sontag, Cosmin Mihai, Galya Orr, Alexei Savchenko, Tatiana Skarina, Hong Cui, John R Cort, Joshua N Adkins, Roslyn N Brown

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ryan L SontagBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Cosmin MihaiEnvironmental Molecular Science Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Galya OrrEnvironmental Molecular Science Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Alexei SavchenkoStructural Proteomics Group, Ontario Center for Structural Proteomics, University of Toronto.
Tatiana SkarinaStructural Proteomics Group, Ontario Center for Structural Proteomics, University of Toronto.
Hong CuiStructural Proteomics Group, Ontario Center for Structural Proteomics, University of Toronto.
John R CortBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Joshua N AdkinsBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; Joshua.Adkins@pnnl.gov.
Roslyn N BrownCenter for Bioproducts and Bioenergy, Washington State University; roslyn.brown@wsu.edu.
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory · USUniversity of Toronto · CAEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory · USWashington State University · US

Funding

Consortia for High-Throughput-Enabled Structural Biology Partnerships (U01)U01GM094623 · NIGMS · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI ADKINS, JOSHUA N. · 2010 to 2014
$5.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM094623NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM094623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of protein interactions in the context of living cells can generate critical information about localization, dynamics, and interacting partners. This information is particularly valuable in the context of host-pathogen interactions. Many pathogen proteins function within host cells in a variety of way such as, enabling evasion of the host immune system and survival within the intracellular environment. To study these pathogen-protein host-cell interactions, several approaches are commonly used, including: in vivo infection with a strain expressing a tagged or mutant protein, or introduction of pathogen genes via transfection or transduction. Each of these approaches has advantages and disadvantages. We sought a means to directly introduce exogenous proteins into cells. Electroporation is commonly used to introduce nucleic acids into cells, but has been more rarely applied to proteins although the biophysical basis is exactly the same. A standard electroporator was used to introduce affinity-tagged bacterial effectors into mammalian cells. Human epithelial and mouse macrophage cells were cultured by traditional methods, detached, and placed in 0.4 cm gap electroporation cuvettes with an exogenous bacterial pathogen protein of interest (e.g. Salmonella Typhimurium GtgE). After electroporation (0.3 kV) and a short (4 hr) recovery period, intracellular protein was verified by fluorescently labeling the protein via its affinity tag and examining spatial and temporal distribution by confocal microscopy. The electroporated protein was also shown to be functional inside the cell and capable of correct subcellular trafficking and protein-protein interaction. While the exogenous proteins tended to accumulate on the surface of the cells, the electroporated samples had large increases in intracellular effector concentration relative to incubation alone. The protocol is simple and fast enough to be done in a parallel fashion, allowing for high-throughput characterization of pathogen proteins in host cells including subcellular targeting and function of virulence proteins.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial ProteinsElectroporationHeLa CellsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceProtein TransportRAW 264.7 CellsRecombinant ProteinsSalmonella typhimuriumTransfectionVirulence FactorsBacterial ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID25650771
PMCPMC4331347
OpenAlexW2083192719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.