Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25650239›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Characterization of monobody scaffold interactions with ligand via force spectroscopy and steered molecular dynamics.

Luthur Siu-Lun Cheung, Daniel J Shea, Nathan Nicholes, Amol Date, Marc Ostermeier, Konstantinos Konstantopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Modular protein switches derived from antibody mimetic proteins.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luthur Siu-Lun Cheung1] Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland [2] Johns Hopkins Institute for NanoBioTechnology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland [3] Johns Hopkins Physical Sciences-Oncology Center, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Daniel J SheaDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Nathan NicholesDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Amol DateDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Marc Ostermeier1] Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland [2] Johns Hopkins Institute for NanoBioTechnology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Konstantinos Konstantopoulos1] Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland [2] Johns Hopkins Institute for NanoBioTechnology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland [3] Johns Hopkins Physical Sciences-Oncology Center, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland [4] Center of Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monobodies are antibody alternatives derived from fibronectin that are thermodynamically stable, small in size, and can be produced in bacterial systems. Monobodies have been engineered to bind a wide variety of target proteins with high affinity and specificity. Using alanine-scanning mutagenesis simulations, we identified two scaffold residues that are critical to the binding interaction between the monobody YS1 and its ligand, maltose-binding protein (MBP). Steered molecular dynamics (SMD) simulations predicted that the E47A and R33A mutations in the YS1 scaffold substantially destabilize the YS1-MBP interface by reducing the bond rupture force and the lifetime of single hydrogen bonds. SMD simulations further indicated that the R33A mutation weakens the hydrogen binding between all scaffold residues and MBP and not just between R33 and MBP. We validated the simulation data and characterized the effects of mutations on YS1-MBP binding by using single-molecule force spectroscopy and surface plasmon resonance. We propose that interfacial stability resulting from R33 of YS1 stacking with R344 of MBP synergistically stabilizes both its own bond and the interacting scaffold residues of YS1. Our integrated approach improves our understanding of the monobody scaffold interactions with a target, thus providing guidance for the improved engineering of monobodies.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularBinding SitesFibronectinsKineticsLigandsMaltose-Binding ProteinsMolecular Dynamics SimulationMutationProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein StabilitySurface Plasmon ResonanceFibronectinsLigandsMaltose-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25650239
PMCPMC4316159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.