Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25650163›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2015

Current status of management of malignant disease: current management of esophageal cancer.

Jonathan Cools-Lartigue, Jonathan Spicer, Lorenzo E Ferri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Long Noncoding RNACancer management and research · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A North American Perspective.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Article
  18. Psychological support of esophageal cancer patient?Journal of thoracic disease · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan Cools-LartigueDepartment of Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada, jonathan.cools-lartigue@mail.mcgill.ca.
Jonathan Spicer
Lorenzo E Ferri
McGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study is to outline the evidence regarding the surgical management of esophageal cancer and provide a single institutional outline regarding its implementation.

backgroundEsophageal cancer is a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Surgery continues to play an important role in its management and offers the best chance for cure in localized and locally advanced disease. However, considerable controversy exists regarding the optimum treatment strategy in this patient population. Furthermore, despite advances in operative and perioperative care and the advent of minimally invasive approaches, the majority of patients succumb to distant metastases after curative intent resection. This failure highlights the importance of multimodal, stage-directed therapy in the management of patients with newly diagnosed esophageal tumors.

methodsHerein, we provide a comprehensive, evidence-based review of the diagnostic workup and locoregional and systemic treatment options available to esophageal cancer patients. The evidence supporting perioperative chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy is outlined and discussed. In addition, we highlight our institutional approach to the diagnostic evaluation, operative selection strategy, and perioperative treatment regimen selection based on the stage of presentation. Finally, we discuss the role of enhanced recovery in the postoperative management of this complex group of patients.

conclusionsEsophageal cancer remains a devastating disease with high mortality. Favorable outcomes mandate a multimodal, stage-directed treatment approach.

Indexed as

Chemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantChemotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm Staging

Identifiers

PMID25650163
OpenAlexW2062865068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.