Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25650156›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2015

A PBPK workflow for first-in-human dose selection of a subcutaneously administered pegylated peptide.

Elliot Offman, Andrea N Edginton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Best Practices in Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Sampling Site Has a Critical Impact on Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elliot OffmanSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada, eoffman@uwaterloo.ca.
Andrea N Edginton
University of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting the pharmacokinetic (PK) time course of a subcutaneously (SC) administered novel therapeutic protein using in silico approaches offers an opportunity to streamline the drug development process by facilitating selection of starting and target doses in initial human trials. Herein, we propose a workflow for predicting the human exposure time course following SC administration. Leveraging knowledge obtained following both intravenous and SC administration in monkeys, this workflow employs the development of a whole body physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model incorporating vascular circulation, lymphatic uptake and both renal and non-specific clearance mechanisms to predict the PK of a novel pegylated peptide. Optimization of the model was initially performed in monkeys, after which the model was scaled up to human proportion. Inclusion of a SC depot compartment allowed for precise simulation of the SC time course in monkeys. Simulated human exposure after SC administration was within approximately 20 % of the observed values and successfully predicted the time course of two subsequent dosing levels. This workflow represents one of the first publications of a PBPK workflow to predict the time course of a SC administered therapeutic protein based off of a single, non-human primate species and shows promise in facilitating the dose selection in first-in-human dose escalation studies for novel protein therapeutics.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMacaca fascicularisModels, BiologicalPeptidesWorkflowPeptides

Identifiers

PMID25650156
OpenAlexW2011518324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.