Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25650091›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2015

Diagnostic and prognostic role of PET/CT in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and progressive disease.

F R Mauro, S Chauvie, F Paoloni, A Biggi, G Cimino, A Rago, M Gentile, F Morabito, M Coscia, M Bellò and 12 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in oncology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Association of [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. 2-[Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Richter's Transformation.Current oncology reports · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Richter Syndrome.Current oncology reports · 2021
    Review
  14. Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Metabolism.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  15. [Clinical value of PET/CT in the diagnosis of Richter syndrome].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Current trends in the management of Richter's syndrome.International journal of hematologic oncology · 2018
    Review
  20. Richter transformation in the era of novel agents.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

F R MauroDepartment of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
S ChauvieDepartment of Medical Physics, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy.
F PaoloniItalian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases (GIMEMA), Rome, Italy.
A BiggiDepartment of Medical Physics, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy.
G CiminoDepartment of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University Polo Pontino, Rome, Italy.
A RagoDepartment of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University Polo Pontino, Rome, Italy.
M GentileHematology Section, Cosenza Hospital, Cosenza, Italy.
F MorabitoHematology Section, Cosenza Hospital, Cosenza, Italy.
M CosciaDepartment of Hematology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
M BellòDepartment of Hematology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
G M SacchettiAmedeo Avogadro University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
D RossiAmedeo Avogadro University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
L LaurentiDepartment of Hematology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
F AutoreDepartment of Hematology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
M CampanelliDepartment of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
F TrastulliDepartment of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
E NicolaiSDN Foundation, Institute of Diagnostic and Nuclar Development, Naples, Italy.
M RiminucciDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
G GaidanoAmedeo Avogadro University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
A GuariniDepartment of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
A GallaminiDepartment of Research and Medical Innovation, Antoine-Lacassagne Cancer Center, Nice, France.
R FoàDepartment of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITAzienda Ospedaliera di Cosenza · ITAzienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera S.Croce e Carle Cuneo · ITPolo d’Innovazione di Genomica · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Turin · ITCentre Antoine Lacassagne · FRFondazione Gimema Onlus · ITSDN Istituto di Ricerca Diagnostica e Nucleare · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to evaluate the predictive value of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) in discriminating the presence of a Richter's syndrome (RS) or a second malignancy (SM), as well as to evaluate its prognostic value in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), we retrospectively analyzed the data of 90 patients who, in the suspicion of a RS or a SM, underwent PET/CT followed by the biopsy of the involved tissue. The median maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUV max) in the presence of a CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma, a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), a Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), a SM were 3.5, 14.6, 7.0 and 6.3, respectively (P ⩽ 0.0001). A SUV max cutoff value ⩾ 5 showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 88.2, 71.2, 51.3 and 94%, respectively, for the presence of a more aggressive disease (DLBCL, HL and SM). A SUV max ⩾ 5 identified also a subset of treatment naive patients with an inferior progression-free survival (P = 0.011) and overall survival (P = 0.067). These findings suggest that PET/CT may helpfully integrate the biologically-based prognostic stratification of CLL. Prospective clinical trials including larger cohorts of patients are needed to conclusively define the role and prognostic impact of PET/CT in the routine management of CLL patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHodgkin DiseaseHumansLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Second PrimaryNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID25650091
OpenAlexW2012189351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.