Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25650023›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2015

Detection of herb-symptom associations from traditional chinese medicine clinical data.

Yu-Bing Li, Xue-Zhong Zhou, Run-Shun Zhang, Ying-Hui Wang, Yonghong Peng, Jing-Qing Hu, Qi Xie, Yan-Xing Xue, Li-Li Xu, Xiao-Fang Liu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Applications of network analysis to routinely collected health care data: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yu-Bing LiSchool of Computer and Information Technology and Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China.
Xue-Zhong ZhouSchool of Computer and Information Technology and Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China.
Run-Shun ZhangGuanganmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medicine Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.
Ying-Hui WangGuanganmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medicine Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.
Yonghong PengSchool of Computing, Informatics and Media, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK.
Jing-Qing HuChina Academy of Chinese Medicine Sciences, Beijing 100700, China ; Institute of Basic Theory of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medicine Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Qi XieChina Academy of Chinese Medicine Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Yan-Xing XueGuanganmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medicine Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.
Li-Li XuGuanganmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medicine Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.
Xiao-Fang LiuDongfang Hospital, Beijing 100078, China.
Bao-Yan LiuChina Academy of Chinese Medicine Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is an individualized medicine by observing the symptoms and signs (symptoms in brief) of patients. We aim to extract the meaningful herb-symptom relationships from large scale TCM clinical data. Methods. To investigate the correlations between symptoms and herbs held for patients, we use four clinical data sets collected from TCM outpatient clinical settings and calculate the similarities between patient pairs in terms of the herb constituents of their prescriptions and their manifesting symptoms by cosine measure. To address the large-scale multiple testing problems for the detection of herb-symptom associations and the dependence between herbs involving similar efficacies, we propose a network-based correlation analysis (NetCorrA) method to detect the herb-symptom associations. Results. The results show that there are strong positive correlations between symptom similarity and herb similarity, which indicates that herb-symptom correspondence is a clinical principle adhered to by most TCM physicians. Furthermore, the NetCorrA method obtains meaningful herb-symptom associations and performs better than the chi-square correlation method by filtering the false positive associations. Conclusions. Symptoms play significant roles for the prescriptions of herb treatment. The herb-symptom correspondence principle indicates that clinical phenotypic targets (i.e., symptoms) of herbs exist and would be valuable for further investigations.

Identifiers

PMID25650023
PMCPMC4305614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.