Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25649959›Full record

ReviewBritish medical bulletin2015

Strengthening routine immunization systems to improve global vaccination coverage.

S V Sodha, V Dietz

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British medical bulletin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S V SodhaGlobal Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Road, MS A-04, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA ssodha@cdc.gov.
V DietzGlobal Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Road, MS A-04, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal coverage with the third dose of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine among children under 1 year of age stagnated at ∼ 83-84% during 2008-13. SOURCES OF DATA: Annual World Health Organization and UNICEF-derived national vaccination coverage estimates. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Incomplete vaccination is associated with poor socioeconomic status, lower education, non-use of maternal-child health services, living in conflict-affected areas, missed immunization opportunities and cancelled vaccination sessions. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Vaccination platforms must expand to include older ages including the second year of life. Immunization programmes, including eradication and elimination initiatives such as those for polio and measles, must integrate within the broader health system. GROWING POINTS: The Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP) 2011-20 is a framework for strengthening immunization systems, emphasizing country ownership, shared responsibility, equity, integration, sustainability and innovation. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Immunization programmes should identify, monitor and evaluate gaps and interventions within the GVAP framework.

Indexed as

Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineMaternal-Child Health ServicesVaccinationDeveloping CountriesEducational StatusHealth Services AccessibilityHumansImmunization ProgramsInfantProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationSocioeconomic FactorsDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineExpanded Programme on Immunizationglobal healthimmunizationroutine immunizationvaccinationvaccination coverage

Identifiers

PMID25649959
PMCPMC10350316
OpenAlexW2148112401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.