Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25649832›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2015

Clinical routine use of dopamine transporter imaging in 516 consecutive patients.

Claire Thiriez, Emmanuel Itti, Gilles Fénelon, Eva Evangelista, Michel Meignan, Pierre Cesaro, Philippe Remy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Relevance ofScientific reports · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Predictors of normal and abnormal outcome in clinical brain dopamine transporter imaging.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2016
    Article
  9. Neuroimaging of Parkinson's disease: Expanding views.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claire ThiriezCentre Expert Parkinson, Service de neurologie, Hôpital Henri Mondor, 51 avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010, Creteil Cedex, France, claire.thiriez@hmn.aphp.fr.
Emmanuel Itti
Gilles Fénelon
Eva Evangelista
Michel Meignan
Pierre Cesaro
Philippe Remy
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri-Mondor · FRUniversité Paris-Est Créteil · FRCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[(123)I]-FP-CIT is a single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) ligand showing in vivo the loss of dopaminergic terminals in the brain and is now available in the market. Despite several systematic studies in clinically inconclusive cases, the use of such imaging in clinical routine is scarcely reported. We analyzed 516 files of subjects with movement disorders who were consecutively examined using [(123)I]-FP-CIT scan and determined whether the use of imaging was appropriate and if it improved clinical diagnosis or care of the patient. In addition, we determined if appropriate use was related to subspecialties in Neurology, e.g., movement disorders' specialists vs. general neurologists, and if appropriate use was increasing over time. Among the 516 scans, 18% were in agreement with the license, 62% were classified as appropriate and 37% were considered inappropriate. A change of management was obvious in 60% of patients, but in 92% of those with an appropriate request vs. 13% of patients with an inappropriate request. Movement disorders' specialists had more appropriate requests than other practitioners. Eventually, comparing the first 100 vs. the last 100 quantified SPECT, performed more than 2.5 years apart, we found no difference for the appropriateness of the examination. The use of [(123)I]-FP-CIT imaging in clinical routine does not fit a restrictive license. An inappropriate use is seen in nearly 40% of cases, which reduces the real cost-effectiveness of the technique suggesting a need for continuing medical education on the topic.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrainDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMovement DisordersRetrospective StudiesTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTropanesYoung Adult2-carbomethoxy-8-(3-fluoropropyl)-3-(4-iodophenyl)tropaneDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsTropanes

Identifiers

PMID25649832
OpenAlexW2024026827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.