ArticleJournal of neurology2015
Clinical routine use of dopamine transporter imaging in 516 consecutive patients.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Utilization and Impact of Dopamine Transporter Imaging in Diagnosing Movement Disorders at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Greece.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Relevance ofScientific reports · 2024Article
- Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.BMC medical imaging · 2022Article
- Clinical utility of DaTscan in patients with suspected Parkinsonian syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2021Review
- A Real-World Study of Cerebral 99mTc-TRODAT-1 Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Imaging of the Dopamine Transporter in Patients with Parkinson Disease from a Tertiary Hospital in Brazil.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020Article
- Nuclear Imaging in the Diagnosis of Clinically Uncertain Parkinsonian Syndromes.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019Review
- Computed-tomography-guided anatomic standardization for quantitative assessment of dopamine transporter SPECT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017Article
- Predictors of normal and abnormal outcome in clinical brain dopamine transporter imaging.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2016Article
- Neuroimaging of Parkinson's disease: Expanding views.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[(123)I]-FP-CIT is a single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) ligand showing in vivo the loss of dopaminergic terminals in the brain and is now available in the market. Despite several systematic studies in clinically inconclusive cases, the use of such imaging in clinical routine is scarcely reported. We analyzed 516 files of subjects with movement disorders who were consecutively examined using [(123)I]-FP-CIT scan and determined whether the use of imaging was appropriate and if it improved clinical diagnosis or care of the patient. In addition, we determined if appropriate use was related to subspecialties in Neurology, e.g., movement disorders' specialists vs. general neurologists, and if appropriate use was increasing over time. Among the 516 scans, 18% were in agreement with the license, 62% were classified as appropriate and 37% were considered inappropriate. A change of management was obvious in 60% of patients, but in 92% of those with an appropriate request vs. 13% of patients with an inappropriate request. Movement disorders' specialists had more appropriate requests than other practitioners. Eventually, comparing the first 100 vs. the last 100 quantified SPECT, performed more than 2.5 years apart, we found no difference for the appropriateness of the examination. The use of [(123)I]-FP-CIT imaging in clinical routine does not fit a restrictive license. An inappropriate use is seen in nearly 40% of cases, which reduces the real cost-effectiveness of the technique suggesting a need for continuing medical education on the topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.