Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25649738›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2015

Increased use of hypnotics in individuals with celiac disease: a nationwide case-control study.

Karl Mårild, Timothy I Morgenthaler, Virend K Somers, Suresh Kotagal, Joseph A Murray, Jonas F Ludvigsson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Circadian rhythms: a regulator of gastrointestinal health and dysfunction.Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Karl MårildDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. karlmarild@gmail.com.
Timothy I MorgenthalerDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center for Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. TMorgenthaler@mayo.edu.
Virend K SomersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. somers.Virend@mayo.edu.
Suresh KotagalDepartments of Neurology and Pediatrics, The Center for Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Kotagal.Suresh@mayo.edu.
Joseph A MurrayDepartments of Medicine and Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Murray.Joseph@mayo.edu.
Jonas F LudvigssonDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. jonasludvigsson@yahoo.com.
Mayo Clinic · USKarolinska Institutet · SENorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough poor sleep is common in numerous gastrointestinal diseases, data are scarce on the risk of poor sleep in celiac disease. The objective of this study was to estimate the risk of repeated use of hypnotics among individuals with celiac disease as a proxy measure for poor sleep.

methodsThis is a nationwide case-control study including 2933 individuals with celiac disease and 14,571 matched controls from the general Swedish population. Poor sleep was defined as ≥2 prescriptions of hypnotics using prospective data from the National Prescribed Drug Register (data capture: July 2005-January 2008). We estimated odds ratios and hazard ratios for poor sleep before and after celiac disease diagnosis respectively.

resultsIn this study, poor sleep was seen in 129/2933 individuals (4.4%) with celiac disease, as compared with 487/14,571 controls (3.3%) (odds ratio = 1.33; 95% CI = 1.08-1.62). Data restricted to sleep complaints starting ≥1 year before celiac disease diagnosis revealed largely unchanged risk estimates (odds ratio = 1.23; 95% CI = 0.88-1.71) as compared with the overall risk (odds ratio 1.33). The risk of poor sleep in celiac disease was essentially not influenced by adjustment for concomitant psychiatric comorbidity (n = 1744, adjusted odds ratio =1.26; 95% CI = 1.02-1.54) or restless legs syndrome (n = 108, adjusted odds ratio = 1.33; 95% CI = 1.08-1.63). Poor sleep was also more common after celiac disease diagnosis as compared with matched controls (hazard ratio = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.30-1.41).

conclusionsIn conclusion, individuals with celiac disease suffer an increased risk of poor sleep, both before and after diagnosis. Although we cannot rule out that surveillance bias has contributed to our findings, our results are consistent with previous data suggesting that sleep complaints may be a manifestation of celiac disease.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesCeliac DiseaseComorbidityDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPrevalenceRestless Legs SyndromeRisk AssessmentSleep Wake DisordersHypnotics and Sedatives

Identifiers

PMID25649738
PMCPMC4322544
OpenAlexW1990769998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.