Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25649731›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2016

Validation and cultural adaptation of "Kujala Score" in Spanish.

Javier Gil-Gámez, Daniel Pecos-Martín, Urho M Kujala, Patricia Martínez-Merinero, Francisco Javier Montañez-Aguilera, Natalia Romero-Franco, Tomás Gallego-Izquierdo

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Central sensitization negatively influences the level of disability in female patients with anterior knee pain.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Validation of the cultural adaptation of the Kujala score in Arabic.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Javier Gil-Gámez, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Daniel Pecos-MartínPhysical Therapy Department, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
Urho M KujalaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Patricia Martínez-Merinero, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Javier Montañez-AguileraPhysical Therapy Department, Cardenal Herrera CEU University, Alfara del Patriarca, Spain.
Natalia Romero-FrancoCatholic University of San Antonio of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Tomás Gallego-IzquierdoPhysical Therapy Department, University of Alcalá, Road Madrid-Barcelona Km 33 600, E-28871, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain. tomas.gallego@uah.es.
Universidad de Alcalá · ESUniversidad Cardenal Herrera CEU · ESUniversidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia · ESUniversity of Jyväskylä · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo translate the patellofemoral disorder questionnaire "Kujala Score" into Spanish and to adapt it for Spanish culture .

methodsInternational recommendations were followed to translate the "Kujala Score" into Spanish together with a cultural adaptation and validation. We analysed the following parameters: internal consistency, agreement construct validity, test-retest reliability, ceiling and floor effects, and responsiveness. The reproducibility and responsiveness were tested in 72 patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome in a test-retest design with follow-up testing at 7 days. The "Kujala Score" and the VISA-P were administered to 98 patients and 30 patients, respectively, who completed the "Kujala Score" and VISA-P after physiotherapy treatment, which consisted of rest, ice, proprioceptive exercise and manual therapy.

resultsThe Spanish "Kujala Score" had high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.8; if an item was deleted, Cronbach α = 0.77-0.80), excellent reliability and agreement (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.99), and good construct validity that was significantly correlated with the outcome of the Spanish VISA-P (Spearman rho = 0.7; P < 0.001). No ceiling or floor effects was detected for the Spanish "Kujala Score" or the responsiveness of the participants based on 40 patients receiving physical therapy, rest, ice and proprioceptive exercises for 1 month, demonstrating that it is a good determinant of changes in the symptomatology of patients with knee pain.

conclusionsThe Spanish adaptation of the patellofemoral disorder questionnaire "Kujala Score" proved to be valid and sensitive to clinical changes and to be a reliable instrument to assess the severity of pain and disability in patients with patellofemoral disorders. This questionnaire will be useful in clinical practice and research as an appropriate tool to evaluate and record the symptomatology of patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome among Spanish population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level I.

Indexed as

Culturally Competent CareSeverity of Illness IndexTranslationsAdultDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementPatellofemoral Pain SyndromePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSpainTranslatingKujala scorePatellofemoral pain syndromeQuestionnaireTranslation

Identifiers

PMID25649731
OpenAlexW2021686106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.