Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25649617›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2015

Analysis of nanopore data using hidden Markov models.

Jacob Schreiber, Kevin Karplus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Unsupervised deep learning for identifying the OSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacob SchreiberNanopore Group, Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Kevin KarplusNanopore Group, Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.

Funding

Optimization of Processive Enzymes for DNA Sequencing using NanoporesR01HG006321 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI AKESON, MARK A · 2011 to 2013
$3.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG006321-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationNanopore-based sequencing techniques can reconstruct properties of biosequences by analyzing the sequence-dependent ionic current steps produced as biomolecules pass through a pore. Typically this involves alignment of new data to a reference, where both reference construction and alignment have been performed by hand.

resultsWe propose an automated method for aligning nanopore data to a reference through the use of hidden Markov models. Several features that arise from prior processing steps and from the class of enzyme used can be simply incorporated into the model. Previously, the M2MspA nanopore was shown to be sensitive enough to distinguish between cytosine, methylcytosine and hydroxymethylcytosine. We validated our automated methodology on a subset of that data by automatically calculating an error rate for the distinction between the three cytosine variants and show that the automated methodology produces a 2-3% error rate, lower than the 10% error rate from previous manual segmentation and alignment. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The data, output, scripts and tutorials replicating the analysis are available at https://github.com/UCSCNanopore/Data/tree/master/Automation.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMarkov ChainsNanopores5-MethylcytosineCytosineDNA MethylationEpigenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNA5-hydroxymethylcytosine5-MethylcytosineCytosine

Identifiers

PMID25649617
PMCPMC4553831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.