Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25649517›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2015

In-situ hybridization of calcium silicate and hydroxyapatite-gelatin nanocomposites enhances physical property and in vitro osteogenesis.

Chi-Kai Chiu, Dong Joon Lee, Hsin Chen, Laurence C Chow, Ching-Chang Ko

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chi-Kai ChiuNC Oral Health Institute, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, CB #7454, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA, cchiu3@ncsu.edu.
Dong Joon Lee
Hsin Chen
Laurence C Chow
Ching-Chang Ko
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USNational Institute of Standards and Technology · US

Funding

Engineering novel bio-inspired materials for stem-cell mediated bone regenerationR01DE022816 · NIDCR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KO, CHING-CHANG · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
Engineering a new biomaterial for stem-cell mediated bone regenerationK08DE018695 · NIDCR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KO, CHING-CHANG · 2008 to 2011
$507k
NIDCR NIH HHS KO8DE018695NIDCR NIH HHS R01DE022816-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low mechanical strengths and inadequate bioactive material-tissue interactions of current synthetic materials limit their clinical applications in bone regeneration. Here, we demonstrate gelatin modified siloxane-calcium silicate (GEMOSIL-CS), a nanocomposite made of gelatinous hydroxyapatite with in situ pozzolanic formation of calcium silicate (CS) interacting among gelatin, silica and Calcium Hydroxide (Ca(OH)2). It is shown the formation of CS matrices, which chemically bonds to the gelatinous hydroxyapatite, provided hygroscopic reinforcement mechanism and promoted both in vitro and in vivo osteogenic properties of GEMOSIL-CS. The formation of CS was identified by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and powder X-ray diffraction. The interfacial bindings within nanocomposites were studied by FTIR and thermogravimetric analysis. Both gelatin and CS have been found critical to the structure integrity and mechanical strengths (93 MPa in compressive strength and 58.9 MPa in biaxial strength). The GEMOSIL-CS was biocompatible and osteoconductive as result of type I collagen secretion and mineralized nodule formation from MC3T3 osteoblasts. SEM and TEM indicated the secretion of collagen fibers and mineral particles as the evidence of mineralization in the early stage of osteogenic differentiation. In vivo bone formation capability was performed by implanting GEMOSIL-CS into rat calvarial defects for 12 weeks and the result showed comparable new bone formation between GEMOSIL-CS group (20%) and the control (20.19%). The major advantage of GEMOSIL-CS composites is in situ self-hardening in ambient or aqueous environment at room temperature providing a simple, fast and cheap method to produce porous scaffolds.

Indexed as

3T3 CellsAnimalsBiophysical PhenomenaBone RegenerationBone SubstitutesCalcium CompoundsDurapatiteGelatinMaleMaterials TestingMiceMicroscopy, ElectronNanocompositesOsteogenesisRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyBone SubstitutesCalcium Compoundscalcium silicateDurapatiteGelatinSilicatesSiloxanes

Identifiers

PMID25649517
OpenAlexW2066530889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.