Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25649467›Full record

Observational studyHealth and quality of life outcomes2015

Preoperative and early postoperative quality of life after major surgery - a prospective observational study.

Julien Maillard, Nadia Elia, Chiara S Haller, Cécile Delhumeau, Bernhard Walder

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Minor effect of loss to follow-up on outcome interpretation in the Swedish spine register.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Changes in quality of life after elective surgery: an observational study comparing two measures.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julien MaillardDivision of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4 - 1206, Geneva, Switzerland. julien.maillard@hcuge.ch.
Nadia EliaDivision of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4 - 1206, Geneva, Switzerland. nadia.elia@hcuge.ch.
Chiara S HallerDepartment of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Massachusetts Mental Health Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, 02215, MA, USA. haller@fas.harvard.edu.
Cécile DelhumeauDivision of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4 - 1206, Geneva, Switzerland. cecile.delhumeau@gmail.com.
Bernhard WalderDivision of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4 - 1206, Geneva, Switzerland. bernhard.walder@hcuge.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChanges in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) several days after surgery have rarely been investigated. We aimed to estimate the perioperative change of HRQoL, to identify patients with clinically relevant decrease in postoperative HRQoL and to establish factors associated with this decrease in HRQoL at day 30 after major surgery.

methodsPatients scheduled for major surgery at a university hospital were enrolled. Based on the HRQoL SF-12 questionnaire, the preoperative physical component summary (PCS) score, preoperative mental component summary (MCS) score, and postoperative PCS and MCS scores at day 30 were recorded. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was defined as those with a decrease of at least one half of the standard deviation (SD) of preoperative PCS or MCS scores. Differences between the groups with or without decreased HRQoL were investigated using univariate comparisons. A multiple logistic regression model was performed to evaluate the predictive value of potential perioperative variables.

resultsThe mean ± SD preoperative PCS score was 38.5 ± 10.6, postoperative score was 35.1 ± 7.8 (p = .004) in 85 patients. Thirty-five patients (41.2%) had a clinically relevant decrease of the postoperative PCS score. A normal to high preoperative exercise metabolic capacity measured with metabolic equivalent of task (MET) (p = .01) was a predictor of the decrease in postoperative PCS. The mean preoperative MCS scores (p = .395) were 42.2 (SD 12.8) preoperative, and 43.45 (SD 12.4) postoperative, respectively.

conclusionsMajor surgery decreases postoperative PCS scores of HRQoL at 30 days. A normal to high exercise capacity was a predictor of a clinically relevant decrease of postoperative PCS scores.

trial registration07-107 (Ethical Committee NAC of Geneva University Hospitals).

Indexed as

AgedCohort StudiesFemaleGeneral SurgeryHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedModels, PsychologicalModels, StatisticalOutcome Assessment, Health CarePostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PainPostoperative PeriodPreoperative PeriodProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID25649467
PMCPMC4333246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.