Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25649214›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2015

Intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients-a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The RSVP Trial).

Claire M Rickard, Nicole M Marsh, Joan Webster, Nicole C Gavin, Matthew R McGrail, Emily Larsen, Amanda Corley, Debbie Long, John R Gowardman, Marghie Murgo and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. A Model of Phlebitis Associated with Peripheral Intravenous Catheters in Orthopedic Inpatients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  11. Primary Intravenous Set Consumption Across 3 Branded Infusion Pumps.Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Claire M RickardNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing (NCREN), Centre for Health Practice Innovation-Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia Infection Management Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Nicole M MarshNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing (NCREN), Centre for Health Practice Innovation-Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Joan WebsterNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing (NCREN), Centre for Health Practice Innovation-Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Nicole C GavinNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing (NCREN), Centre for Health Practice Innovation-Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Matthew R McGrailSchool of Rural Health, Monash University, Churchill, Australia.
Emily LarsenNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing (NCREN), Centre for Health Practice Innovation-Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Amanda CorleyNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing (NCREN), Centre for Health Practice Innovation-Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Debbie LongNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing (NCREN), Centre for Health Practice Innovation-Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
John R GowardmanNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing (NCREN), Centre for Health Practice Innovation-Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Marghie MurgoClinical Excellence Commission, Sydney, Australia Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
John F FraserNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing (NCREN), Centre for Health Practice Innovation-Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Raymond J ChanNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing (NCREN), Centre for Health Practice Innovation-Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Marianne C WallisNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing (NCREN), Centre for Health Practice Innovation-Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Australia.
Jeanine YoungLady Cilento Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Australia.
David McMillanInflammation and Healing Research Cluster, School of Health and Sport Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Australia.
Li ZhangInflammation and Healing Research Cluster, School of Health and Sport Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Australia.
Md Abu ChoudhuryNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing (NCREN), Centre for Health Practice Innovation-Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Nicholas GravesInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
E Geoffrey PlayfordNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing (NCREN), Centre for Health Practice Innovation-Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia Infection Management Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Griffith University · AUNational Health and Medical Research Council · AUUniversity of the Sunshine Coast · AUMental Health Commission · AUMonash University · AUPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AUQueensland Children’s Hospital · AUQueensland University of Technology · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVascular access devices (VADs), such as peripheral or central venous catheters, are vital across all medical and surgical specialties. To allow therapy or haemodynamic monitoring, VADs frequently require administration sets (AS) composed of infusion tubing, fluid containers, pressure-monitoring transducers and/or burettes. While VADs are replaced only when necessary, AS are routinely replaced every 3-4 days in the belief that this reduces infectious complications. Strong evidence supports AS use up to 4 days, but there is less evidence for AS use beyond 4 days. AS replacement twice weekly increases hospital costs and workload. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) of equivalence design comparing AS replacement at 4 (control) versus 7 (experimental) days. Randomisation is stratified by site and device, centrally allocated and concealed until enrolment. 6554 adult/paediatric patients with a central venous catheter, peripherally inserted central catheter or peripheral arterial catheter will be enrolled over 4 years. The primary outcome is VAD-related bloodstream infection (BSI) and secondary outcomes are VAD colonisation, AS colonisation, all-cause BSI, all-cause mortality, number of AS per patient, VAD time in situ and costs. Relative incidence rates of VAD-BSI per 100 devices and hazard rates per 1000 device days (95% CIs) will summarise the impact of 7-day relative to 4-day AS use and test equivalence. Kaplan-Meier survival curves (with log rank Mantel-Cox test) will compare VAD-BSI over time. Appropriate parametric or non-parametric techniques will be used to compare secondary end points. p Values of <0.05 will be considered significant. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Relevant ethical approvals have been received. CONSORT Statement recommendations will be used to guide preparation of any publication. Results will be presented at relevant conferences and sent to the major organisations with clinical practice guidelines for VAD care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN 12610000505000).

Indexed as

Catheterization, PeripheralCatheters, IndwellingCentral Venous CathetersVascular Access DevicesCatheter-Related InfectionsClinical ProtocolsDevice RemovalHospitalizationHumansKaplan-Meier EstimatePhlebitisResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID25649214
PMCPMC4322194
OpenAlexW2146660647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.