ArticleGenome medicine2015
Bayesian models for syndrome- and gene-specific probabilities of novel variant pathogenicity.
Article in Genome medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Profiling ofCirculation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2025Article
- Using large-scale population-based data to improve disease risk assessment of clinical variants.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- Novel gene-specific Bayesian Gaussian mixture model to predict the missense variants pathogenicity of Sanfilippo syndrome.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- PheSeq, a Bayesian deep learning model to enhance and interpret the gene-disease association studies.Genome medicine · 2024Article
- Change Point Analysis for Detecting Vaccine Safety Signals.Vaccines · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Bayesian genome- and epigenome-wide association studies with gene level dependence.Biometrics · 2017Article
- J-Wave syndromes expert consensus conference report: Emerging concepts and gaps in knowledge.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2017Review
- J-Wave syndromes expert consensus conference report: Emerging concepts and gaps in knowledge.Journal of arrhythmia · 2016Article
- J-Wave syndromes expert consensus conference report: Emerging concepts and gaps in knowledge.Heart rhythm · 2016Review
- Gene-set Analysis with CGI Information for Differential DNA Methylation Profiling.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Enhanced Classification of Brugada Syndrome-Associated and Long-QT Syndrome-Associated Genetic Variants in the SCN5A-Encoded Na(v)1.5 Cardiac Sodium Channel.Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics · 2015Article
- Enhancing the Predictive Power of Mutations in the C-Terminus of the KCNQ1-Encoded Kv7.1 Voltage-Gated Potassium Channel.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2015Article
- Variant interpretation through Bayesian fusion of frequency and genomic knowledge.Genome medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith the advent of affordable and comprehensive sequencing technologies, access to molecular genetics for clinical diagnostics and research applications is increasing. However, variant interpretation remains challenging, and tools that close the gap between data generation and data interpretation are urgently required. Here we present a transferable approach to help address the limitations in variant annotation.
methodsWe develop a network of Bayesian logistic regression models that integrate multiple lines of evidence to evaluate the probability that a rare variant is the cause of an individual's disease. We present models for genes causing inherited cardiac conditions, though the framework is transferable to other genes and syndromes.
resultsOur models report a probability of pathogenicity, rather than a categorisation into pathogenic or benign, which captures the inherent uncertainty of the prediction. We find that gene- and syndrome-specific models outperform genome-wide approaches, and that the integration of multiple lines of evidence performs better than individual predictors. The models are adaptable to incorporate new lines of evidence, and results can be combined with familial segregation data in a transparent and quantitative manner to further enhance predictions. Though the probability scale is continuous, and innately interpretable, performance summaries based on thresholds are useful for comparisons. Using a threshold probability of pathogenicity of 0.9, we obtain a positive predictive value of 0.999 and sensitivity of 0.76 for the classification of variants known to cause long QT syndrome over the three most important genes, which represents sufficient accuracy to inform clinical decision-making. A web tool APPRAISE [http://www.cardiodb.org/APPRAISE] provides access to these models and predictions.
conclusionsOur Bayesian framework provides a transparent, flexible and robust framework for the analysis and interpretation of rare genetic variants. Models tailored to specific genes outperform genome-wide approaches, and can be sufficiently accurate to inform clinical decision-making.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.