Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25649125›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2015

Bayesian models for syndrome- and gene-specific probabilities of novel variant pathogenicity.

Dace Ruklisa, James S Ware, Roddy Walsh, David J Balding, Stuart A Cook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Functional Profiling ofCirculation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. J-Wave syndromes expert consensus conference report: Emerging concepts and gaps in knowledge.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dace RuklisaUCL Genetics Institute, London, UK.
James S WareNIHR Biomedical Research Unit in Cardiovascular Disease at Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, UK ; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK.
Roddy WalshNIHR Biomedical Research Unit in Cardiovascular Disease at Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, UK.
David J BaldingUCL Genetics Institute, London, UK ; Current address: Department of Genetics and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Stuart A CookNIHR Biomedical Research Unit in Cardiovascular Disease at Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, UK ; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK ; National Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore ; Duke-National University, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/13/13/29819British Heart Foundation SP/10/10/28431Medical Research Council MC_U120085815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the advent of affordable and comprehensive sequencing technologies, access to molecular genetics for clinical diagnostics and research applications is increasing. However, variant interpretation remains challenging, and tools that close the gap between data generation and data interpretation are urgently required. Here we present a transferable approach to help address the limitations in variant annotation.

methodsWe develop a network of Bayesian logistic regression models that integrate multiple lines of evidence to evaluate the probability that a rare variant is the cause of an individual's disease. We present models for genes causing inherited cardiac conditions, though the framework is transferable to other genes and syndromes.

resultsOur models report a probability of pathogenicity, rather than a categorisation into pathogenic or benign, which captures the inherent uncertainty of the prediction. We find that gene- and syndrome-specific models outperform genome-wide approaches, and that the integration of multiple lines of evidence performs better than individual predictors. The models are adaptable to incorporate new lines of evidence, and results can be combined with familial segregation data in a transparent and quantitative manner to further enhance predictions. Though the probability scale is continuous, and innately interpretable, performance summaries based on thresholds are useful for comparisons. Using a threshold probability of pathogenicity of 0.9, we obtain a positive predictive value of 0.999 and sensitivity of 0.76 for the classification of variants known to cause long QT syndrome over the three most important genes, which represents sufficient accuracy to inform clinical decision-making. A web tool APPRAISE [http://www.cardiodb.org/APPRAISE] provides access to these models and predictions.

conclusionsOur Bayesian framework provides a transparent, flexible and robust framework for the analysis and interpretation of rare genetic variants. Models tailored to specific genes outperform genome-wide approaches, and can be sufficiently accurate to inform clinical decision-making.

Identifiers

PMID25649125
PMCPMC4308924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.