Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25649000›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2015

Sizing ocean giants: patterns of intraspecific size variation in marine megafauna.

Craig R McClain, Meghan A Balk, Mark C Benfield, Trevor A Branch, Catherine Chen, James Cosgrove, Alistair D M Dove, Leo Gaskins, Rebecca R Helm, Frederick G Hochberg and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Energyscapes pinpoint marine megafauna feeding hotspots in the Mediterranean.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The extinct marine megafauna of the Phanerozoic.Cambridge prisms. Extinction · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The sizes of life.PloS one · 2023
    Article
  16. The extinct sharkScience advances · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Craig R McClainNational Evolutionary Synthesis Center , Durham, NC , USA ; Department of Biology, Duke University , Durham, NC , USA.
Meghan A BalkDepartment of Biology, University of New Mexico , Albuquerque, NM , USA.
Mark C BenfieldDepartment of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences, Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge, LA , USA.
Trevor A BranchSchool of Aquatic & Fishery Sciences, University of Washington , Seattle, WA , USA.
Catherine ChenDepartment of Biology, Duke University , Durham, NC , USA.
James CosgroveNatural History Section, Royal British Columbia Museum , Victoria, BC , Canada.
Alistair D M DoveGeorgia Aquarium , Atlanta, GA , USA.
Leo GaskinsDepartment of Biology, Duke University , Durham, NC , USA.
Rebecca R HelmDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University , Providence, RI , USA.
Frederick G HochbergDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology, Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History , Santa Barbara, CA , USA.
Frank B LeeDepartment of Biology, Duke University , Durham, NC , USA.
Andrea MarshallMarine Megafauna Foundation , Truckee, CA , USA.
Steven E McMurrayDepartment of Biology and Marine Biology, University of North Carolina Wilmington , Wilmington, NC , USA.
Caroline SchancheDepartment of Biology, Duke University , Durham, NC , USA.
Shane N StoneDepartment of Biology, Duke University , Durham, NC , USA.
Andrew D ThalerBlackbeard Biologic: Science and Environmental Advisors , Vallejo, CA , USA.

Funding

Integrated, Interdisciplinary, Inter-university PHD Program Computational BiologyT32EB009414 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI SMITH, FELISA ANNAMARIE · 2009 to 2013
$989k
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What are the greatest sizes that the largest marine megafauna obtain? This is a simple question with a difficult and complex answer. Many of the largest-sized species occur in the world's oceans. For many of these, rarity, remoteness, and quite simply the logistics of measuring these giants has made obtaining accurate size measurements difficult. Inaccurate reports of maximum sizes run rampant through the scientific literature and popular media. Moreover, how intraspecific variation in the body sizes of these animals relates to sex, population structure, the environment, and interactions with humans remains underappreciated. Here, we review and analyze body size for 25 ocean giants ranging across the animal kingdom. For each taxon we document body size for the largest known marine species of several clades. We also analyze intraspecific variation and identify the largest known individuals for each species. Where data allows, we analyze spatial and temporal intraspecific size variation. We also provide allometric scaling equations between different size measurements as resources to other researchers. In some cases, the lack of data prevents us from fully examining these topics and instead we specifically highlight these deficiencies and the barriers that exist for data collection. Overall, we found considerable variability in intraspecific size distributions from strongly left- to strongly right-skewed. We provide several allometric equations that allow for estimation of total lengths and weights from more easily obtained measurements. In several cases, we also quantify considerable geographic variation and decreases in size likely attributed to humans.

Indexed as

AllometryBody sizeClineIntraspecific variationMegafauna

Identifiers

PMID25649000
PMCPMC4304853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.