ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2015
The mathematical limits of genetic prediction for complex chronic disease.
Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Simulation Models to Track and Address the Opioid Crisis.Epidemiologic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Using large biobanks for psychiatric genomic research: Consistency of clinical and genetic aspects of recorded depression across US states in the All of Us Research Program.Psychological medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Current applications of precision medicine: a bibliometric analysis.Personalized medicine · 2019Review
- Precision public health-the Emperor's new clothes.International journal of epidemiology · 2019Article
- What matters, when, for whom? three questions to guide population health scholarship.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2018Article
- Cardiovascular Risk Stratification: From Phenotype to Genotype?Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2018Article
- Population Health Science and the Challenges of Prediction.Annals of internal medicine · 2017Article
- Commentary: The Limits of Risk Factors Revisited: Is It Time for a Causal Architecture Approach?Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2017Article
- Setting the Agenda for a New Discipline: Population Health Science.American journal of public health · 2016Article
- The Genetics of Stress-Related Disorders: PTSD, Depression, and Anxiety Disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2016Review
- Pragmatic medicine in solid cancer: a translational alternative to precision medicine.OncoTargets and therapy · 2016Article
- News from the NIH: potential contributions of the behavioral and social sciences to the precision medicine initiative.Translational behavioral medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAttempts at predicting individual risk of disease based on common germline genetic variation have largely been disappointing. The present paper formalises why genetic prediction at the individual level is and will continue to have limited utility given the aetiological architecture of most common complex diseases.
methodsData were simulated on one million populations with 10 000 individuals in each populations with varying prevalences of a genetic risk factor, an interacting environmental factor and the background rate of disease. The determinant risk ratio and risk difference magnitude for the association between a gene variant and disease is a function of the prevalence of the interacting factors that activate the gene, and the background rate of disease.
resultsThe risk ratio and total excess cases due to the genetic factor increase as the prevalence of interacting factors increase, and decrease as the background rate of disease increases. Germline genetic variations have high predictive capacity for individual disease only under conditions of high heritability of particular genetic sequences, plausible only under rare variant hypotheses.
conclusionsUnder a model of common germline genetic variants that interact with other genes and/or environmental factors in order to cause disease, the predictive capacity of common genetic variants is determined by the prevalence of the factors that interact with the variant and the background rate. A focus on estimating genetic associations for the purpose of prediction without explicitly grounding such work in an understanding of modifiable (including environmentally influenced) factors will be limited in its ability to yield important insights about the risk of disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.