Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25648956›Full record

ArticleTransgenic research2015

Next-generation sequencing is a robust strategy for the high-throughput detection of zygosity in transgenic maize.

Leonie Fritsch, Rainer Fischer, Christoph Wambach, Max Dudek, Stefan Schillberg, Florian Schröper

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Transgenic research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leonie FritschFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Forckenbeckstrasse 6, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Rainer Fischer
Christoph Wambach
Max Dudek
Stefan Schillberg
Florian Schröper

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simple and reliable, high-throughput techniques to detect the zygosity of transgenic events in plants are valuable for biotechnology and plant breeding companies seeking robust genotyping data for the assessment of new lines and the monitoring of breeding programs. We show that next-generation sequencing (NGS) applied to short PCR products spanning the transgene integration site provides accurate zygosity data that are more robust and reliable than those generated by PCR-based methods. The NGS reads covered the 5' border of the transgenic events (incorporating part of the transgene and the flanking genomic DNA), or the genomic sequences flanking the unfilled transgene integration site at the wild-type locus. We compared the NGS method to competitive real-time PCR with transgene-specific and wild-type-specific primer/probe pairs, one pair matching the 5' genomic flanking sequence and 5' part of the transgene and the other matching the unfilled transgene integration site. Although both NGS and real-time PCR provided useful zygosity data, the NGS technique was favorable because it needed fewer optimization steps. It also provided statistically more-reliable evidence for the presence of each allele because each product was often covered by more than 100 reads. The NGS method is also more suitable for the genotyping of large panels of plants because up to 80 million reads can be produced in one sequencing run. Our novel method is therefore ideal for the rapid and accurate genotyping of large numbers of samples.

Indexed as

AllelesDNA, PlantDNA PrimersGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPlants, Genetically ModifiedReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSeedsSequence Analysis, DNATransgenesZea maysDNA, PlantDNA Primers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.