Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25648730›Full record

ArticleAustralian and New Zealand journal of public health2015

Differences in grass pollen allergen exposure across Australia.

Paul J Beggs, Constance H Katelaris, Danielle Medek, Fay H Johnston, Pamela K Burton, Bradley Campbell, Alison K Jaggard, Don Vicendese, David M J S Bowman, Ian Godwin and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian and New Zealand journal of public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pollen respiratory allergy: Is it really seasonal?The World Allergy Organization journal · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Pollen Exposure and Cardiopulmonary Health Impacts in Adelaide, South Australia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. A Review of the Respiratory Health Burden Attributable to Short-Term Exposure to Pollen.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  10. Monitoring airborne pollen in New Zealand.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Paul J BeggsDepartment of Environment and Geography, Macquarie University, New South Wales.
Constance H Katelaris
Danielle Medek
Fay H Johnston
Pamela K Burton
Bradley Campbell
Alison K Jaggard
Don Vicendese
David M J S Bowman
Ian Godwin
Alfredo R Huete
Bircan Erbas
Brett J Green
Rewi M Newnham
Ed Newbigin
Simon G Haberle
Janet M Davies

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAllergic rhinitis and allergic asthma are important chronic diseases posing serious public health issues in Australia with associated medical, economic, and societal burdens. Pollen are significant sources of clinically relevant outdoor aeroallergens, recognised as both a major trigger for, and cause of, allergic respiratory diseases. This study aimed to provide a national, and indeed international, perspective on the state of Australian pollen data using a large representative sample.

methodsAtmospheric grass pollen concentration is examined over a number of years within the period 1995 to 2013 for Brisbane, Canberra, Darwin, Hobart, Melbourne, and Sydney, including determination of the 'clinical' grass pollen season and grass pollen peak.

resultsThe results of this study describe, for the first time, a striking spatial and temporal variability in grass pollen seasons in Australia, with important implications for clinicians and public health professionals, and the Australian grass pollen-allergic community.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate that static pollen calendars are of limited utility and in some cases misleading. This study also highlights significant deficiencies and limitations in the existing Australian pollen monitoring and data. IMPLICATIONS: Establishment of an Australian national pollen monitoring network would help facilitate advances in the clinical and public health management of the millions of Australians with asthma and allergic rhinitis.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureAir PollutantsAllergensAsthmaAustraliaFemaleHumansParticulate MatterPoaceaePollenRhinitis, Allergic, SeasonalSpatio-Temporal AnalysisAir PollutantsAllergensParticulate Matterallergenallergic asthmaallergic rhinitispollenseason

Identifiers

PMID25648730
PMCPMC4704082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.