Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25648696›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2014

Metatranscriptomic analysis of lignocellulolytic microbial communities involved in high-solids decomposition of rice straw.

Christopher W Simmons, Amitha P Reddy, Patrik D'haeseleer, Jane Khudyakov, Konstantinos Billis, Amrita Pati, Blake A Simmons, Steven W Singer, Michael P Thelen, Jean S VanderGheynst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christopher W SimmonsJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA ; Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
Amitha P ReddyJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA ; Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
Patrik D'haeseleerJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA ; Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94551 USA.
Jane KhudyakovJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA ; Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94551 USA.
Konstantinos BillisJoint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598 USA.
Amrita PatiJoint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598 USA.
Blake A SimmonsJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA ; Biological and Materials Science Center, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94551 USA.
Steven W SingerJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA ; Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
Michael P ThelenJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA ; Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94551 USA.
Jean S VanderGheynstJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA ; Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew lignocellulolytic enzymes are needed that maintain optimal activity under the harsh conditions present during industrial enzymatic deconstruction of biomass, including high temperatures, the absence of free water, and the presence of inhibitors from the biomass. Enriching lignocellulolytic microbial communities under these conditions provides a source of microorganisms that may yield robust lignocellulolytic enzymes tolerant to the extreme conditions needed to improve the throughput and efficiency of biomass enzymatic deconstruction. Identification of promising enzymes from these systems is challenging due to complex substrate-enzyme interactions and requirements to assay for activity. In this study, metatranscriptomes from compost-derived microbial communities enriched on rice straw under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions were sequenced and analyzed to identify lignocellulolytic enzymes overexpressed under thermophilic conditions. To determine differential gene expression across mesophilic and thermophilic treatments, a method was developed which pooled gene expression by functional category, as indicated by Pfam annotations, since microbial communities performing similar tasks are likely to have overlapping functions even if they share no specific genes.

resultsDifferential expression analysis identified enzymes from glycoside hydrolase family 48, carbohydrate binding module family 2, and carbohydrate binding module family 33 domains as significantly overexpressed in the thermophilic community. Overexpression of these protein families in the thermophilic community resulted from expression of a small number of genes not currently represented in any protein database. Genes in overexpressed protein families were predominantly expressed by a single Actinobacteria genus, Micromonospora.

conclusionsCoupling measurements of deconstructive activity with comparative analyses to identify overexpressed enzymes in lignocellulolytic communities provides a targeted approach for discovery of candidate enzymes for more efficient biomass deconstruction. Glycoside hydrolase family 48 cellulases and carbohydrate binding module family 33 polysaccharide monooxygenases with carbohydrate binding module family 2 domains may improve saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass under high-temperature and low moisture conditions relevant to industrial biofuel production.

Indexed as

BiofuelsCarbohydrate binding module family 2Carbohydrate binding module family 33CellulaseGlycoside hydrolase family 48Lignocellulose deconstructionMicrobial communitiesSolid-state culture

Identifiers

PMID25648696
PMCPMC4296540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.