Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25648552›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2016

Outcomes of FLEXIBLE Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) Implementation: A Prospective Real Life Study.

M Annet Nugter, Fabiana Engelsbel, Michiel Bähler, René Keet, Remmers van Veldhuizen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Economic evaluation of intensive home treatment in comparison to care as usual alongside a randomised controlled trial.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M Annet NugterDepartment of Research and Monitoring, Mental Health Service Organization GGZ Noord-Holland-Noord, PO Box 18, 1850 BA, Heiloo, The Netherlands. a.nugter@ggz-nhn.nl.
Fabiana EngelsbelDepartment of Research and Monitoring, Mental Health Service Organization GGZ Noord-Holland-Noord, PO Box 18, 1850 BA, Heiloo, The Netherlands.
Michiel BählerDepartment of Community Mental Health, Mental Health Service Organization GGZ Noord-Holland-Noord, PO Box 18, 1850 BA, Heiloo, The Netherlands.
René KeetDepartment of Community Mental Health, Mental Health Service Organization GGZ Noord-Holland-Noord, PO Box 18, 1850 BA, Heiloo, The Netherlands.
Remmers van VeldhuizenCentre for Certification ACT and FACT (CCAF), Praediniussingel 20/9, 9711 AG, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate social and clinical outcomes and use of care during and after implementation of FLEXIBLE Assertive Community Treatment (ACT). Three teams and 372 patients were involved. Model fidelity, clinical and social assessments were performed at baseline and after 1 and 2 years. Use of care was registered continuously. Model fidelity was good at the end of the study. Data showed much variation between patients in number and duration of ACT periods. Statistically significant improvements were found in compliance, unmet needs and quality of life. Improvement of quality of life and functioning was related to duration of ACT. The percentage of remissions increased with 9 %. The number of admissions, admission days and face to face contacts differed between ACT and non-ACT patients, but generally decreased. Findings suggest that implementation of FACT results in a more flexible adaptation of care to the needs of the patients.

Indexed as

Patient Care TeamPatient-Centered CareAdultCommunity Mental Health ServicesFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareProspective StudiesQuality of LifeAdmissionsClinical outcomesFLEXIBLE ACT (FACT)Severe mental illness (SMI)

Identifiers

PMID25648552
PMCPMC5108818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.